Neuroscience, ethics, and national security: the state of the art
- PMID: 22448146
- PMCID: PMC3308927
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001289
Neuroscience, ethics, and national security: the state of the art
Abstract
National security organizations in the United States, including the armed services and the intelligence community, have developed a close relationship with the scientific establishment. The latest technology often fuels warfighting and counter-intelligence capacities, providing the tactical advantages thought necessary to maintain geopolitical dominance and national security. Neuroscience has emerged as a prominent focus within this milieu, annually receiving hundreds of millions of Department of Defense dollars. Its role in national security operations raises ethical issues that need to be addressed to ensure the pragmatic synthesis of ethical accountability and national security.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Committee on Military and Intelligence Methodology for Emergent Neurophysiological and Cognitive/Neural Research in the Next Two Decades, National Research Council of the National Academies. Emerging cognitive neuroscience and related technologies. Washington (D.C.): National Academies Press; 2008. 214
-
- Committee on Opportunities in Neuroscience for Future Army Applications, National Research Council of the National Academies. Opportunities in neuroscience for future army applications. Washington (D.C.): National Academies Press; 2009. 136
-
- Kosal M. E, Huang J. Y. Security implications of cognitive neuroscience research: Results from an ethnographic survey of researchers. Brain Waves Module 3: Neuroscience, conflict and security. London: The Royal Society; 2011.
-
- Lebedev M. A, Nicolelis M. A. L. Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci. 2006;29(9):536–546. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
