Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar 26:12:242.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-242.

Adoption and use of social media among public health departments

Affiliations

Adoption and use of social media among public health departments

Rosemary Thackeray et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Effective communication is a critical function within any public health system. Social media has enhanced communication between individuals and organizations and has the potential to augment public health communication. However, there is a lack of reported data on social media adoption within public health settings. The purposes of this study were to assess: 1) the extent to which state public health departments (SHDs) are using social media; 2) which social media applications are used most often; and 3) how often social media is used interactively to engage audiences.

Methods: This was a non-experimental, cross sectional study of SHD social media sites. Screen capture software Snag-It® was used to obtain screenshots of SHD social media sites across five applications. These sites were coded for social media presence, interactivity, reach, and topic.

Results: Sixty percent of SHDs reported using at least one social media application. Of these, 86.7% had a Twitter account, 56% a Facebook account, and 43% a YouTube channel. There was a statistically significant difference between average population density and use of social media (p = .01). On average, SHDs made one post per day on social media sites, and this was primarily to distribute information; there was very little interaction with audiences. SHDs have few followers or friends on their social media sites. The most common topics for posts and tweets related to staying healthy and diseases and conditions. Limitations include the absence of a standard by which social media metrics measure presence, reach, or interactivity; SHDs were only included if they had an institutionally maintained account; and the study was cross sectional.

Conclusions: Social media use by public health agencies is in the early adoption stage. However, the reach of social media is limited. SHDs are using social media as a channel to distribute information rather than capitalizing on the interactivity available to create conversations and engage with the audience. If public health agencies are to effectively use social media then they must develop a strategic communication plan that incorporates best practices for expanding reach and fostering interactivity and engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Safko J, Brake DK. The social media bible: Hoboken. NJ: Wiley; 2009.
    1. Stern J. Social media metrics: Hoboken. NJ: Wiley; 2010.
    1. Mangold WG, Faulds DJ. Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus Horiz. 2009;52:357–365. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002. - DOI
    1. Vance K, Howe W, Dellavale RP. Social internet sites as a source of public health information. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27(2):133–136. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2008.11.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sutton JN. Twittering Tennessee: distributed networks and collaboration following a technological disaster. Proceedings of the 7th International ISCRAM Conference: May 2010; Seattle, WA. 2010. http://www.iscram.org/ISCRAM2010/Papers/113-Sutton.pdf

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources