Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4579-88.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.26649. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

Racial, socioeconomic, and demographic disparities in access to fertility preservation in young women diagnosed with cancer

Affiliations

Racial, socioeconomic, and demographic disparities in access to fertility preservation in young women diagnosed with cancer

Joseph M Letourneau et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: This study seeks to examine the relation between sociodemographic characteristics and the utilization of fertility preservation services in reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer.

Methods: A total of 1041 women diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 18 and 40 years responded to a retrospective survey on demographic information and reproductive health history. Five cancer types were included: leukemia, Hodgkin disease, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer. Nine hundred eighteen women reported treatment with potential to affect fertility (chemotherapy, pelvic radiation, pelvic surgery, or bone marrow transplant). Student t test, linear regression, and multivariate logistic regression were used where appropriate to determine the relation between sociodemographic characteristics and the odds of using fertility preservation services.

Results: Sixty-one percent of women were counseled on the risk of cancer treatment to fertility by the oncology team. Overall, 4% of women pursued fertility preservation. In multivariate analysis, women who had not attained a bachelor's degree (odds ratio [OR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.9) were less likely to be counseled. Trends also suggested possible disparities in access to fertility preservation with age older than 35 years (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-1.4) or previous children (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-1.1) at diagnosis. Disparities in access to fertility preservation based on ethnicity and sexual orientation were also observed.

Conclusions: Sociodemographic health disparities likely affect access to fertility preservation services. Although awareness of fertility preservation has improved in the past decade, an unmet need remains for reproductive health counseling and fertility preservation in reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of Counseling for Fertility Preservation and Utilization of Fertility Preservation from 1993 to 2007 among Young Female Cancer Survivors

References

    1. NCI Fast Stats Statistics stratified by age. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result. (SEER) 2006 [online], http://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/selections.php.
    1. Knopman J, Papadopoulos E, Grifo J, et al. Surviving childhood and reproductive-age malignancy: effects on fertility and future parenthood. The lancet oncology. 2010;11(5):490–8. - PubMed
    1. Partridge A, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2004;22(20):4174–83. - PubMed
    1. Patel A, Sreedevi M, Malapati R, et al. Reproductive health assessment for women with cancer: a pilot study. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;201(2):191.e1–4. - PubMed
    1. Letourneau J, Ebbel E, Katz P, et al. Pre-treatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer. In press. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms