The case for a parental duty to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis for medical benefit
- PMID: 22452463
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656798
The case for a parental duty to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis for medical benefit
Abstract
This article explores the possibility that there is a parental duty to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the medical benefit of future children. Using one genetic disorder as a paradigmatic example, we find that such a duty can be supported in some situations on both ethical and legal grounds. Our analysis shows that an ethical case in favor of this position can be made when potential parents are aware that a possible future child is at substantial risk of inheriting a serious genetic condition. We further argue that a legal case for a duty to use PGD for medical benefit can be made in situations in which potential parents have chosen to conceive through in vitro fertilization and know that any children conceived are at substantial risk of having a serious genetic condition.
Comment in
-
Duty-free: the non-obligatory nature of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.669269. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452462 No abstract available.
-
In favor of PGD: the moral duty to avoid harm argument.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):12-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656808. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452464 No abstract available.
-
A parental duty to use PGD: more than we bargained for?Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):14-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.659370. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452465 No abstract available.
-
A wrongful case for parental tort liability.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):15-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.659371. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452466 No abstract available.
-
The harms of a duty: misapplication of the best interest standard.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):17-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656802. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452467 No abstract available.
-
Moral duty in the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656816. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452468 No abstract available.
-
A duty to use IVF?Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):21-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656807. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452469 No abstract available.
-
A duty to discriminate?Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):22-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656814. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452470 No abstract available.
-
Revisiting the non-identity problem and the virtues of parenthood.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):24-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656804. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452471 No abstract available.
-
More mud, less crystal? Ambivalence, disability, and PGD.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):26-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656817. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452472 No abstract available.
-
The ethics of PGD: what about the physician?Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):28-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656806. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452473 No abstract available.
-
Acting in the best interest of a child does not mean choosing the "best" child.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):29-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.659372. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452474 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous