Swabbing students: should universities be allowed to facilitate educational DNA testing?
- PMID: 22452475
- PMCID: PMC3390747
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656803
Swabbing students: should universities be allowed to facilitate educational DNA testing?
Abstract
Recognizing the profound need for greater patient and provider familiarity with personalized genomic medicine, many university instructors are including personalized genotyping as part of their curricula. During seminars and lectures students run polymerase chain reactions on their own DNA or evaluate their experiences using direct-to-consumer genetic testing services subsidized by the university. By testing for genes that may influence behavioral or health-related traits, however, such as alcohol tolerance and cancer susceptibility, certain universities have stirred debate on the ethical concerns raised by educational genotyping. Considering the potential for psychosocial harm and medically relevant outcomes, how far should university-facilitated DNA testing be permitted to go? The analysis here distinguishes among these learning initiatives and critiques their approaches to the ethical concerns raised by educational genotyping.
Comment in
-
Assessing the pedagogical goals of self-testing in evaluating the consultation needs of different student populations.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):41-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656815. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452476 No abstract available.
-
Personalized genomic educational testing: what do the undergrads think?Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):43-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656818. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452477 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Introducing personal genomics to college athletes: potentials and pitfalls.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):45-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656811. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452478 No abstract available.
-
The professor really wants me to do my homework: conflicts of interest in educational research.Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(4):47-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.656813. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22452479 No abstract available.
References
-
- A DNA education. Nature. 2010;465(7300):845–846. - PubMed
-
- Andrews LB. from nude photos to naked genomes: berkeley gets poor marks on frosh gene tests. [accessed August 11, 2011];The blog of the Institute for Science Law and Technology at Chicago-Kent College of Law 7 September. 2010 Available at: http://blogs.kentlaw.edu/islat/author-lori-andrews.
-
- Angrist M. Here is a human being: At the dawn of personal genomics. New York, NY: Harper; 2010.
-
- Berg C, Fryer Edwards K. The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008;77(1):17–31.
-
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. [accessed August 11, 2011];Genomic medicine training program. 2009 Available at: http://genomicmedicineinitiative.org/pdfs/Curriculum2009-2010.pdf.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical