Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;3(2):140-54.
doi: 10.1037/a0026576. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

Self- and informant-reported perspectives on symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder

Affiliations

Self- and informant-reported perspectives on symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder

Luke D Cooper et al. Personal Disord. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Because narcissistic individuals tend to have an inflated view of themselves and their abilities, the reliance on self-reported information in the assessment and diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is problematic. Hence, the use of informants in the assessment of NPD may be necessary. In the current study we examined self- and informant-reported features of NPD using agreement, frequency, and discrepancy analyses. The results indicated that informants tended to report more NPD features than selves, and that there were either low or nonsignificant levels of self-informant agreement among the 9 NPD diagnostic criteria and its categorical diagnosis. Informants were increasingly more likely to report higher raw scores relative to selves, indicating that the discrepancy between self- and informant reports increases with the NPD scale. Informants also reported NPD features that selves often did not, suggesting that current prevalence estimates of NPD, which use only self-reported information, are most likely underestimates. These results highlight the importance of gathering informant-reported data in addition to self-reported data when assessing NPD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ratios (self/informant) of raw score endorsement frequencies across the number of NPD criteria endorsed. Raw score = the number of narcissistic personality disorder criteria endorsed. The horizontal dashed line represents where the data points would lie if selves and informants were equally likely to endorse each raw score.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ICCs for the self- and informant-reported narcissistic personality disorder diagnostic criteria. In all graphs, the horizontal axis represents the latent narcissistic PD trait in SD units (range from low, − 4.0, to high 4.0) and the vertical axis represents the probability that an item would be endorsed, from .00 (no probability) to 1.00 (certainty). Solid lines represent the self-reported ICCs; segmented lines represent the informant-reported ICCs. * p < .006.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Test characteristic curves for self-reported data (solid line) and informant-reported data (segmented line). A raw score is equal to the number of NPD features endorsed.

References

    1. Achenbach TM, Krukowski RA, Dunenci L, Ivanova MY. Assessment of adult psychopathology: Meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations. Psychological Bulletin. 2005;131:361–382. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.361. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4. Washington, DC: Author; 2000. text revision.
    1. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin. 1990;107:238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernstein DP, Kasapis C, Bergman A, Weld E, Mitropoulou V, Horvath T, Siever LJ. Assessing Axis II disorders by informant interview. Journal of Personality Disorders. 1997;11:158–167. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1997.11.2.158. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cain NM, Pincus AL, Ansell EB. Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review. 2008;28:638–656. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.09.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types