Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 15;18(10):2922-9.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2217. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

Survival of 1,181 patients in a phase I clinic: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experience

Affiliations

Survival of 1,181 patients in a phase I clinic: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experience

Jennifer Wheler et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH; London, UK) prognostic score for phase I patients can be validated in a large group of individuals seen in a different center and whether other prognostic variables are also relevant, we present an analysis of 1,181 patients treated in the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC; Houston, TX) phase I clinic.

Experimental design: Medical records of 1,181 consecutive patients who were treated on at least one trial in the phase I clinic were reviewed.

Results: The median age was 58 years and 50% were women. The median number of prior therapies was four and median survival 10 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.1-10.9 months]. Independent factors that predicted shorter survival in a multivariate Cox model and could be internally validated included RMH score of >1 (P < 0.0001; albumin <3.5 g/dL; lactate dehydrogenase >upper limit of normal, and >two sites of metastases), gastrointestinal tumor type (P < 0.0001), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 1 (P = 0.0004). The median survival was 24.0, 15.2, 8.4, 6.2, and 4.1 months for patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 or 5 of the above risk factors, respectively.

Conclusion: The RMH score was validated in a large group of patients at MDACC. Internal validation of the independent prognostic factors for survival led to the development of the MDACC prognostic score, a modification of the RMH score that strengthens it.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1A
Fig 1A
Patients by tumor type (total n=1,181).
Fig 1B
Fig 1B
Type of Phase I trial.
Fig 2A
Fig 2A
Kaplan - Meier survival curve for overall survival in 1,181 patients. Ticks represent patients still alive and hence censored at last follow up.
Fig 2B
Fig 2B
Kaplan - Meier survival curve for the 5 risk groups based on MDACC score (n=1,153 patients for whom all baseline data points were available). Ticks represent patients still alive and hence censored at last follow up.
Fig 2C
Fig 2C
Kaplan - Meier survival curve for the 4 risk groups based on RMH score (n=1,169 patients for whom all baseline data points were available). Ticks represent patients still alive and hence censored at last follow up.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Proposed algorithm to assign patients to one of the five risk groups that predict survival characterized by summing the number of risk factors present at the time of first visit to the Phase I clinic. All risk factors carry equal weight.

References

    1. Arkenau HT, Olmos D, Ang JE, de Bono J, Judson I, Kaye S. Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for patients treated within the context of a phase I study: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience. British Journal of Cancer. 2008;98(6):1029–1033. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–655. - PubMed
    1. Harrell FE, Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15(4):361–387. - PubMed
    1. Bachelot T, Ray-Coquard I, Catimel G, Ardiet C, Guastalla JP, Dumortier A, et al. Multivariable analysis of prognostic factors for toxicity and survival for patients enrolled in phase I clinical trials. Ann Oncol. 2000;11(2):151–156. - PubMed
    1. Arkenau HT, Olmos D, Ang JE, Barriuso J, Karavasilis V, Ashley S, et al. 90-Days mortality rate in patients treated within the context of a phase-I trial: how should we identify patients who should not go on trial? European Journal of Cancer. 2008;44(11):1536–1540. - PubMed

MeSH terms