Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;17(4):204-8.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182254cf1.

Shifts in national rates of inpatient prolapse surgery emphasize current coding inadequacies

Affiliations

Shifts in national rates of inpatient prolapse surgery emphasize current coding inadequacies

Sarah L Bradley et al. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: : This study aimed to assess national rates, types, and routes of inpatient surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States in 1998 compared to those in 2007.

Methods: : We used the 1998 and 2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, which represents a stratified, random sample of discharge data from US hospitals. We included women 20 years and older who underwent surgery for prolapse based on diagnosis and procedure codes of the International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification. We calculated the number of women undergoing surgery each year and incidence rates.

Results: : The total number of women undergoing prolapse surgeries was 92,503 in 1998 versus 113,646 in 2007. The incidence rate of surgery increased slightly, from 90.8 to 100.9 per 100,000 women, respectively. The most common procedure was hysterectomy, representing approximately half of prolapse surgeries in 1998 and 2007. Suspension procedures accounted for 18.8% of procedures in 2007, an increase from 6.1% in 1998. Surgeries performed via a minimally invasive route increased from 4.8% in 1998 to 9.4% in 2007. However, it was difficult to determine the route for many procedures based on current ICD-9 codes. There were also no codes that specifically designated mesh kit procedures or minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies.

Conclusions: : During the last decade, the rate of inpatient prolapse surgery has slightly increased. The proportion of suspension procedures has increased; however, it is difficult to determine the route of these procedures based on current ICD-9 codes. These findings emphasize that ICD-9 procedure codes have not kept up with changes in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, et al. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(2 Pt 1):299–305. - PubMed
    1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–506. - PubMed
    1. Subak LL, Waejten LE, van den Eeden S, et al. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(4):646–651. - PubMed
    1. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1311–1316. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, et al. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1196–1208. - PMC - PubMed