Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(3):e32250.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032250. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

Sample size under inverse negative binomial group testing for accuracy in parameter estimation

Osval Antonio Montesinos-López  1 , Abelardo Montesinos-López, José Crossa, Kent Eskridge
Affiliations

Sample size under inverse negative binomial group testing for accuracy in parameter estimation

Osval Antonio Montesinos-López et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Background: The group testing method has been proposed for the detection and estimation of genetically modified plants (adventitious presence of unwanted transgenic plants, AP). For binary response variables (presence or absence), group testing is efficient when the prevalence is low, so that estimation, detection, and sample size methods have been developed under the binomial model. However, when the event is rare (low prevalence <0.1), and testing occurs sequentially, inverse (negative) binomial pooled sampling may be preferred.

Methodology/principal findings: This research proposes three sample size procedures (two computational and one analytic) for estimating prevalence using group testing under inverse (negative) binomial sampling. These methods provide the required number of positive pools ([Formula: see text]), given a pool size (k), for estimating the proportion of AP plants using the Dorfman model and inverse (negative) binomial sampling. We give real and simulated examples to show how to apply these methods and the proposed sample-size formula. The Monte Carlo method was used to study the coverage and level of assurance achieved by the proposed sample sizes. An R program to create other scenarios is given in Appendix S2.

Conclusions: The three methods ensure precision in the estimated proportion of AP because they guarantee that the width (W) of the confidence interval (CI) will be equal to, or narrower than, the desired width ([Formula: see text]), with a probability of [Formula: see text]. With the Monte Carlo study we found that the computational Wald procedure (method 2) produces the more precise sample size (with coverage and assurance levels very close to nominal values) and that the samples size based on the Clopper-Pearson CI (method 1) is conservative (overestimates the sample size); the analytic Wald sample size method we developed (method 3) sometimes underestimated the optimum number of pools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Dorfman R. The detection of defective members of large populations. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1943;14(4):436–440.
    1. Westreich DJ, Hudgens MG, Fiscus SA, Pilcher CD. Optimizing screening for acute human immunodeficiency virus infection with pooled nucleic acid amplification tests. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2008;46(5):1785–1792. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dodd R, Notari E, Stramer S. Current prevalence and incidence of infectious disease markers and estimated window-period risk in the American Red Cross donor population. Transfusion. 2002;42:975–979. - PubMed
    1. Remlinger K, Hughes-Oliver J, Young S, Lam R. Statistical design of pools using optimal coverage and minimal collision. Technometrics. 2006;48:133–143.
    1. Verstraeten T, Farah B, Duchateau L, Matu R. Pooling sera to reduce the cost of HIV surveillance: a feasibility study in a rural Kenyan district. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 1998;3:747–750. - PubMed