Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Apr;14(4):206-15.
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00595.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

Single-pill combination of telmisartan/amlodipine in patients with severe hypertension: results from the TEAMSTA severe HTN study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Single-pill combination of telmisartan/amlodipine in patients with severe hypertension: results from the TEAMSTA severe HTN study

Joel M Neutel et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Apr.

Abstract

This 8-week, randomized, double-blind, controlled study compared efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan/amlodipine (T/A) single-pill combination (SPC) vs the respective monotherapies in 858 patients with severe hypertension (systolic/diastolic blood pressure [SBP/DBP] ≥180/95 mm Hg). At 8 weeks, T/A provided significantly greater reductions from baseline in seated trough cuff SBP/DBP (-47.5 mm Hg/-18.7 mm Hg) vs T (P<.0001) or A (P=.0002) monotherapy; superior reductions were also evident at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks. Blood pressure (BP) goal and response rates were consistently higher with T/A vs T or A. T/A was well tolerated, with less frequent treatment-related adverse events vs A (12.6% vs 16.4%) and a numerically lower incidence of peripheral edema and treatment discontinuation. In conclusion, treatment of patients with substantially elevated BP with T/A SPCs resulted in high and significantly greater BP reductions and higher BP goal and response rates than the respective monotherapies. T/A SPCs were well tolerated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean reductions (±standard error of mean [SEM]) from baseline in seated trough cuff systolic blood pressure (SBP) (panel A) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (panel B) by treatment week (note that some SEMs may not be visible as they are too small to reach beyond the border of the symbol), mean seated trough cuff SBP (panel C) and DBP (panel D) by treatment week, and patients assigned to the telmisartan/amlodipine (T/A) or amlodipine (A) groups received telmisartan 80 mg (T80)/ amlodipine 5 mg (A5) or A5 for the first 2 weeks, then T80/amlodipine 10 mg (A10) or A10 for the remaining 6 weeks; patients in the T80 group remained on the same treatment for the entire 8 weeks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean reductions in mean seated trough cuff systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to end of study (week 8) per baseline SBP category; 10‐mm Hg increments. Patients assigned to the telmisartan/amlodipine (T/A) or amlodipine (A) groups received telmisartan 80 mg (T80)/amlodipine 5 mg (A5) or A5 for the first 2 weeks, then T80/amlodipine 10 mg (A10) or A10 for the remaining 6 weeks; patients in the T80 group remained on the same treatment for the entire 8 weeks. DBP indicates diastolic blood pressure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean reductions from baseline in seated trough cuff systolic blood pressure across hypertensive patient subpopulations.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Proportion of patients (%) achieving systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and blood pressure (BP) goal at study end (week 8).

References

    1. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age‐specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta‐analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–1913. - PubMed
    1. INVEST . INVEST retrospective analyses. ACC2010. http://www.theheart.org/article/1055859.do .
    1. ACCORD Study Group . Effects of intensive blood‐pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1575–1585. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Appel LJ, Wright JT Jr, Greene T, et al; AASK Collaborative Research Group . Intensive blood‐pressure control in hypertensive chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:918–929. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dickerson JE, Hingorani AD, Ashby MJ, et al. Optimization of antihypertensive treatment by crossover rotation of four major classes. Lancet. 1999;353:2008–2013. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms