Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal
- PMID: 22460315
- DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000100009
Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal
Abstract
This in vitro study compared different ultrasonic vibration modes for intraradicular cast post removal. The crowns of 24 maxillary canines were removed, the roots were embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and the canals were treated endodontically. The post holes were prepared and root canal impressions were taken with self-cured resin acrylic. After casting, the posts were cemented with zinc phosphate cement. The samples were randomly distributed into 3 groups (n=8): G1: no ultrasonic vibration (control); G2: tip of the ultrasonic device positioned perpendicularly to core surface and close to the incisal edge; and G3: tip of the ultrasonic device positioned perpendicularly to core surface at cervical region, close to the line of cementation. An Enac OE-5 ultrasound unit with an ST-09 tip was used. All samples were submitted to the tensile test using an universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests (α=0.05). Mean values of the load to dislodge the posts (MPa) were: G1 = 4.6 (± 1.4) A; G2 = 2.8 (± 0.9) B, and G3= 0.9 (± 0.3) C. Therefore, the ultrasonic vibration applied with the tip of device close to the core's cervical area showed higher ability to reduce the retention of cast post to root canal.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement.Int Endod J. 2009 Jul;42(7):609-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01555.x. Epub 2009 May 8. Int Endod J. 2009. PMID: 19467051 Clinical Trial.
-
Different ultrasonic vibration protocols and their effects on retention of post-and-core to root canal.Gen Dent. 2013 Aug;61(5):40-2. Gen Dent. 2013. PMID: 23928437
-
Influence of luting agents on time required for cast post removal by ultrasound: an in vitro study.J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 May-Jun;17(3):145-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000300003. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009. PMID: 19466241 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of ultrasound in removal of intraradicular posts using different techniques.J Oral Sci. 2005 Sep;47(3):117-21. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.47.117. J Oral Sci. 2005. PMID: 16313088
-
The influence of ultrasound on the retention of cast posts cemented with different agents.Int Endod J. 2001 Mar;34(2):93-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00353.x. Int Endod J. 2001. PMID: 11307266 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Effect of ultrasonic tip designs on intraradicular post removal.Restor Dent Endod. 2014 Nov;39(4):265-9. doi: 10.5395/rde.2014.39.4.265. Epub 2014 Jul 17. Restor Dent Endod. 2014. PMID: 25383344 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous