Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;7(1):32-8.

Surgical prosthetic treatment

Affiliations

Surgical prosthetic treatment

Christian Carulli et al. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Fragility fractures typically occur in elderly patients related principally to osteoporosis. A significative percentage of these fractures have to be treated surgically but comorbilities are often present, and need to be grossly stabilized before surgery. However, there is for these fractures a high rate of morbidity and mortality at short-term. Moreover, patients affected by a fragility fracture are at risk for another fragility fracture later in life.The Authors present an overview of the main patterns of proximal femoral fractures, underlining the peculiar features and choices of surgical treatment, and relating to specific indications and results of each treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a, b - a: Garden 1 type femoral fracture in a 61 years old male patient. b: Fixation with three partially threaded screws.
Figure 2
Figure 2
a, b - a: Garden 4 type femoral fracture in a 80 years old female patient. b: Unipolar cemented prosthesis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
a, b - a: Garden 3 type femoral fracture in a 76 years old female patient. b: Bipolar cemented prosthesis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
a, b - a: Garden 4 type femoral fracture in a 62 years old male patient. b: Total hip cemented arthroplasty.
Figure 5
Figure 5
a, b - a: Garden 3 type femoral fracture in a 60 years old female patient. b: Total hip cementless arthroplasty.
Figure 6
Figure 6
a, b - a: Trochanteric fracture in a 77 years old female patient. b: Open reduction and internal fixation with sliding hip screw.
Figure 7
Figure 7
a, b - a: Trochanteric fracture in a 75 years old female patient. b: Open reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary nail.
Figure 8
Figure 8
a, b - a: Trochanteric fracture in a 70 years old female patient b: Open reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary locked nail and helical blade.
Figure 9
Figure 9
a, b - a: Complex trochanteric fracture in a 79 years old female patient. b: Total hip cemented arthroplasty with a calcar reconstruction implant.

References

    1. Canale Terry S. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics - 10th Ed. Vol. 52. Verduci Editore; 2005. pp. 2789–2850.
    1. Koval KJ, Zuckerman J.D. “Handbook of fractures” 2nd edition. Vol. 25. Lippincott,Williams & Wilkins; 2002. pp. 176–195.
    1. Schmidt AH. “The Changing Face of Orthopaedic Trauma: Fragility and Periprosthetic Fractures”. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:11–16. - PubMed
    1. Stromsoe K. “Fracture Fixation Problems in Osteoporosis”. Injury. 2004;35:107–113. - PubMed
    1. Nikolau VS, Pathanasopulos A, Giannoudis PV. “What’s New in the Management of Proximal Femoral Fractures?”. Injury. 2008;39:1309–1318. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources