Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;13(1):3-10.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6863.

Medical evaluation and triage of the agitated patient: consensus statement of the american association for emergency psychiatry project Beta medical evaluation workgroup

Kimberly Nordstrom  1 , Leslie S Zun, Michael P Wilson, Victor Stiebel, Anthony T Ng, Benjamin Bregman, Eric L Anderson
Affiliations

Medical evaluation and triage of the agitated patient: consensus statement of the american association for emergency psychiatry project Beta medical evaluation workgroup

Kimberly Nordstrom et al. West J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Numerous medical and psychiatric conditions can cause agitation; some of these causes are life threatening. It is important to be able to differentiate between medical and nonmedical causes of agitation so that patients can receive appropriate and timely treatment. This article aims to educate all clinicians in nonmedical settings, such as mental health clinics, and medical settings on the differing levels of severity in agitation, basic triage, use of de-escalation, and factors, symptoms, and signs in determining whether a medical etiology is likely. Lastly, this article focuses on the medical workup of agitation when a medical etiology is suspected or when etiology is unclear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding, sources, and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. The authors disclosed none.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evaluation in a nonmedical setting. BARS, Behavioural Activity Rating Scale; ED, emergency department; PES, psychiatric emergency service.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Medical evaluation in the emergency department or psychiatric emergency service. FS glucose, finger-stick glucose.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Holloman GH, Jr, Zeller SL. Overview of Project BETA: best practices in evaluation and treatment of agitation. West J Emerg Med. 2011;13:1–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kopecky HJ, Kopecky CR, Yudofsky SC. Reliability and validity of the Overt Agitation Severity Scale in adult psychiatric inpatients. Psychiatr Q. 1998;69:301–323. - PubMed
    1. Silver JM, Yudofsky SC. The Overt Aggression Scale: overview and guiding principles. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991;3:S22–S29. - PubMed
    1. Swift RH, Harrigan EP, Cappelleri JC, et al. Validation of the behavioural activity rating scale (BARS): a novel measure of activity in agitated patients. J Psychiatr Res. 2002;36:87–95. - PubMed
    1. Olshaker JS, Browne B, Jerrard DA, et al. Medical clearance and screening of psychiatric patients in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4:124–128. - PubMed