Use and avoidance of seclusion and restraint: consensus statement of the american association for emergency psychiatry project Beta seclusion and restraint workgroup
- PMID: 22461919
- PMCID: PMC3298214
- DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6867
Use and avoidance of seclusion and restraint: consensus statement of the american association for emergency psychiatry project Beta seclusion and restraint workgroup
Abstract
Issues surrounding reduction and/or elimination of episodes of seclusion and restraint for patients with behavioral problems in crisis clinics, emergency departments, inpatient psychiatric units, and specialized psychiatric emergency services continue to be an area of concern and debate among mental health clinicians. An important underlying principle of Project BETA (Best practices in Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation) is noncoercive de-escalation as the intervention of choice in the management of acute agitation and threatening behavior. In this article, the authors discuss several aspects of seclusion and restraint, including review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines regulating their use in medical behavioral settings, negative consequences of this intervention to patients and staff, and a review of quality improvement and risk management strategies that have been effective in decreasing their use in various treatment settings. An algorithm designed to help the clinician determine when seclusion or restraint is most appropriate is introduced. The authors conclude that the specialized psychiatric emergency services and emergency departments, because of their treatment primarily of acute patients, may not be able to entirely eliminate the use of seclusion and restraint events, but these programs can adopt strategies to reduce the utilization rate of these interventions.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Perceptions of nurses working with psychiatric consumers regarding the elimination of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient settings and emergency departments: An Australian survey.Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Feb;28(1):209-225. doi: 10.1111/inm.12522. Epub 2018 Jul 18. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019. PMID: 30019798 Free PMC article.
-
Resource Utilization with the Use of Seclusion and Restraint in a Dedicated Emergency Psychiatric Service.South Med J. 2018 Nov;111(11):703-705. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000885. South Med J. 2018. PMID: 30392009
-
[A clinical trial for developing PICU management scale, a tool reviewing the frequency and use of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric acute care].Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2005;107(5):423-36. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2005. PMID: 15981618 Clinical Trial. Japanese.
-
Improving the management of acutely agitated patients in the emergency department through implementation of Project BETA (Best Practices in the Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation).J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jul 3;1(5):898-907. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12138. eCollection 2020 Oct. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020. PMID: 33145538 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interventions to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint in inpatient psychiatric settings: what we know so far a review of the literature.Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;56(4):412-23. doi: 10.1177/0020764009106630. Epub 2009 Jul 17. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2010. PMID: 19617275 Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Mental Illness Stigma on Psychiatric Emergencies.Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 19;11:573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00573. eCollection 2020. Front Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32636773 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns of Restraint Utilization in a Community Hospital's Psychiatric Inpatient Units.Psychiatr Q. 2016 Mar;87(1):31-48. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9353-7. Psychiatr Q. 2016. PMID: 25899518
-
Activities and technologies: developing safer acute inpatient mental health care.World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):242-243. doi: 10.1002/wps.20967. World Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35524595 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Effectiveness of De-Escalation in Reducing Aggression and Coercion in Acute Psychiatric Units. A Cluster Randomized Study.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 7;13:856153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.856153. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35463507 Free PMC article.
-
The Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes of Nurses Regarding Physical Restraint: Survey Results from Psychiatric Inpatient Settings.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 23;18(13):6747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136747. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34201597 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Department of Health and Human Services. Condition of participation: patient's rights. Federal Register 482.13. 2006. pp. 71426–71428.
-
- Haimowitz S, Urff J, Huckshorn KA. Restraint and seclusion—a risk management guide. 2011. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Web site. Available at: http://www.nasmhpd.org/general_files/publications/ntac_pubs/R-S RISK MGMT 10-10-06.pdf. Accessed July 6.
-
- Fisher WA. Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1584–1591. - PubMed
-
- Mohr WK, Petti TA, Mohr BD. Adverse effects associated with physical restraint. Can J Psychiatry. 2003;48:330–337. - PubMed