Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:980369.
doi: 10.1155/2012/980369. Epub 2012 Feb 26.

The use of an early alert system to improve compliance with sepsis bundles and to assess impact on mortality

Jennifer Anne Larosa  1 , Noeen Ahmad, Monica Feinberg, Monica Shah, Roseann Dibrienza, Sean Studer
Affiliations

The use of an early alert system to improve compliance with sepsis bundles and to assess impact on mortality

Jennifer Anne Larosa et al. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012.

Abstract

Introduction. Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines, organized as sepsis bundles, have been shown to improve mortality, but timely and consistent implementation of these can be challenging. Our study examined the use of a screening tool and an early alert system to improve bundle compliance and mortality. Methods. A screening tool was used to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and an overhead alert system known as Code SMART (Sepsis Management Alert Response Team) was activated at the physician's discretion. Data was collected for 6 months and compliance with bundle completion and mortality were compared between the Code SMART and non-Code SMART groups. Results. Fifty eight patients were enrolled -34 Code SMART and 24 non-Code SMART. The Code SMART group achieved greater compliance with timely antibiotic administration (P < 0.001), lactate draw (P < 0.001), and steroid use (P = 0.02). Raw survival and survival adjusted for age, leucopenia, and severity of illness scores, were greater in the Code SMART group (P < 0.05, P = 0.03, and P = 0.01). Conclusions. A screening tool and an alert system can improve compliance with sepsis bundle elements and improve survival from severe sepsis and septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;348(16):1546–1554. - PubMed
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Critical Care Medicine. 2008;36(1):296–327. - PubMed
    1. Zambon M, Ceola M, Almeida-de-Castro R, Gullo A, Vincent JL. Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: we could go faster. Journal of Critical Care. 2008;23(4):455–460. - PubMed
    1. Coba V, Whitmill M, Mooney R, et al. Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2011;26(5):304–313. - PubMed
    1. Lefrant JY, Muller L, Raillard A, et al. Reduction of the severe sepsis or septic shock associated mortality by reinforcement of the recommendations bundle: a multicenter study. Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation. 2010;29(9):621–628. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources