Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 May;93(5):1489-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.030. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

Transcutaneous aortic valve implantation using the left carotid access: feasibility and early clinical outcomes

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Transcutaneous aortic valve implantation using the left carotid access: feasibility and early clinical outcomes

Thomas Modine et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: In some patients, transfemoral, transaxillary, or transapical aortic valve implantation is not possible. Thus, carotid artery access may represent a safe alternative to those accesses, and even offers certain advantages. In this article, we describe aortic valve implantation using the left carotid arterial approach and report our initial experience.

Methods: Using a self-expandable nitinol based device (CoreValve ReValving system, Medtronic Ltd, Luxembourg), we exposed the left carotid artery through a small incision. Arterial puncture and initial 6F sheath introduction were achieved through a contraincision. The same implantation technique as for transaxillary implantation was used. Progressive artery dilatation was achieved using sheaths of increasing diameter. Rapid ventricular pacing was used to reduce cardiac output while performing a routine aortic balloon valvuloplasty. Only then, an 18F sheath was inserted into the carotid artery and pushed down into the ascending aorta. The patients were monitored using cerebral oxymetry to assess cerebral perfusion.

Results: Twelve consecutive patients, at high surgical risk, were implanted and studied prospectively. Transfemoral and subclavian catheterization were considered unfeasible or at risk of severe complications. Carotid arterial injury did not occur in any patient. A transient ischemic attack occurred in 1 patient, contralateral to the carotid access. There were no deaths in either intraprocedural or during the 30-day follow-up period.

Conclusions: This initial experience suggests that left carotid transarterial aortic valve implantation, in selected high-risk patients, is feasible and safe with satisfactory short-term outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Invited commentary.
    Roselli EE. Roselli EE. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 May;93(5):1494-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.02.038. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22541181 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms