Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jun;182(1-2):82-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.03.015. Epub 2012 Mar 23.

Performance of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel Fast in a clinical laboratory setting

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel Fast in a clinical laboratory setting

Pia Jokela et al. J Virol Methods. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to develop a real-time RT-PCR for the detection of enteroviruses (EVs) and rhinoviruses (RVs) and to assess the performance of the xTAG RVP Fast assay in comparison to a direct fluorescent assay (DFA), a real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV), and the EV/RV RT-PCR assay developed in this study. The performance of the RVP Fast assay was assessed in the analysis of 373 nasopharyngeal samples. For the viruses of the DFA panel, detection rates of 27.6% and 23.8% were obtained by RVP and DFA, respectively, in analysis of a set of 297 samples collected in 2009-2010. These results show statistically significant superiority of the RVP Fast assay (P=0.049). For RSV, hMPV, EV, and RV, detection rates of 48.0% and 45.2% were achieved by RVP and RT-PCR, respectively. For individual targets, increased detection of EV/RV (P=0.043) and decreased detection of influenza A virus (P=0.004) by RVP in comparison to real-time RT-PCR was observed. The results of the present study imply the need to adjust the InfA component of the RVP Fast assay to also cover the InfA(H1N1) 2009 virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cilla G., Oñate E., Perez-Yarza E.G., Montes M., Vicente D., Perez-Trallero E. Viruses in community-acquired pneumonia in children aged less than 3 years old: high rate of viral coinfection. J. Med. Virol. 2008;80:1843–1849. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esper F.P., Spahlinger T., Zhou L. Rate and influence of respiratory virus co-infection on pandemic (H1N1) influenza disease. J. Infect. 2011;63:260–266. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gadsby N.J., Hardie A., Claas E.C.J., Templeton K.E. Comparison of the luminex respiratory virus panel fast assay with in-house real-time PCR for respiratory viral infection diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010;48:2213–2216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gharabaghi F., Hawan A., Drews J., Richardson S.E. Evaluation of multiple commercial molecular and conventional diagnostic arrays for the detection of respiratory viruses in children. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011;17:1900–1906. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ginocchio C.C., St George K. Likelihood that an unsubtypeable influenza A result in the Luminex xTAG respiratory panel is indicative of novel A/H1N1 (swine-like) influenza. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:2347–2348. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms