Impact of occupational carcinogens on lung cancer risk in a general population
- PMID: 22467291
- PMCID: PMC3396321
- DOI: 10.1093/ije/dys042
Impact of occupational carcinogens on lung cancer risk in a general population
Erratum in
- Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;42(6):1902
Abstract
Background: Exposure to occupational carcinogens is an important preventable cause of lung cancer. Most of the previous studies were in highly exposed industrial cohorts. Our aim was to quantify lung cancer burden attributable to occupational carcinogens in a general population.
Methods: We applied a new job-exposure matrix (JEM) to translate lifetime work histories, collected by personal interview and coded into standard job titles, into never, low and high exposure levels for six known/suspected occupational lung carcinogens in the Environment and Genetics in Lung cancer Etiology (EAGLE) population-based case-control study, conducted in Lombardy region, Italy, in 2002-05. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in men (1537 cases and 1617 controls), by logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders, including smoking and co-exposure to JEM carcinogens. The population attributable fraction (PAF) was estimated as impact measure.
Results: Men showed an increased lung cancer risk even at low exposure to asbestos (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.42-2.18), crystalline silica (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.00-1.71) and nickel-chromium (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.90-1.53); risk increased with exposure level. For polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, an increased risk (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.99-2.70) was found only for high exposures. The PAFs for any exposure to asbestos, silica and nickel-chromium were 18.1, 5.7 and 7.0%, respectively, equivalent to an overall PAF of 22.5% (95% CI: 14.1-30.0). This corresponds to about 1016 (95% CI: 637-1355) male lung cancer cases/year in Lombardy.
Conclusions: These findings support the substantial role of selected occupational carcinogens on lung cancer burden, even at low exposures, in a general population.
Comment in
-
Qualitative job exposure matrix--a tool for the quantification of population-attributable fractions for occupational lung carcinogens?Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):356-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys192. Epub 2012 Dec 24. Int J Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23266615 No abstract available.
-
Authors' response to: qualitative job-exposure matrix--a tool for the quantification of population-attributable fractions for occupational lung carcinogens?Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):357-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys193. Epub 2012 Dec 24. Int J Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23266616 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Impact of occupational carcinogens on lung cancer risk in a general population.Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;42(6):1894. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt174. Int J Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 24415625 No abstract available.
-
Authors' response to: comment upon the article: impact of occupational carcinogens on lung cancer risk in a general population.Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;42(6):1895-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt176. Int J Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 24415626 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917. - PubMed
-
- Driscoll T, Nelson DI, Steenland K, et al. The global burden of disease due to occupational carcinogens. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48:419–31. - PubMed
-
- Benichou J. A review of adjusted estimators of attributable risk. Stat Methods Med Res. 2001;10:195–216. - PubMed
-
- McGuire V, Nelson LM, Koepsell TD, Checkoway H, Longstreth WT., Jr Assessment of occupational exposures in community-based case–control studies. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:35–53. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical