Recipient survival and graft survival are not diminished by simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: an analysis of the united network for organ sharing database
- PMID: 22467623
- PMCID: PMC3405201
- DOI: 10.1002/lt.23440
Recipient survival and graft survival are not diminished by simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: an analysis of the united network for organ sharing database
Abstract
Recipients of solitary liver and kidney transplants are living longer, and this increases their risk of long-term complications such as recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) and drug-induced nephrotoxicity. These complications may require retransplantation. Since the adoption of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, the number of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK) procedures has increased. However, there are no standardized criteria for organ allocation to SLK candidates. The aims of this study were to retrospectively compare recipient and graft survival with liver transplantation alone (LTA), SLK, kidney after liver transplantation (KALT), and liver after kidney transplantation (LAKT) and to identify independent risk factors affecting recipient and graft survival. The United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database (1988-2007) was queried for adult LTA (66,026), SLK (2327), KALT (1738), and LAKT procedures (242). After adjustments for potential confounding demographic and clinical variables, there was no difference in recipient mortality rates with LTA and SLK (P = 0.02). However, there was a 15% decreased risk of graft loss with SLK versus LTA (hazard ratio = 0.85, P < 0.001). The recipient and graft survival rates with SLK were higher than the rates with both KALT (P <0.001 and P <0.001) and LAKT (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001). The following were all identified as independent negative predictors of recipient mortality and graft loss: recipient age ≥ 65 years, male sex, black race, HCV/diabetes mellitus status, donor age ≥ 60 years, serum creatinine level ≥2.0 mg/dL, cold ischemia time > 12 hours, and warm ischemia time > 60 minutes. Although the recent increase in the number of SLK procedures performed each year has effectively decreased the number of potential donor kidneys available to patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) awaiting kidney transplantation, SLK in patients with end-stage liver disease and ESRD is justified because of the lower risk of graft loss with SLK versus LTA as well as the superior recipient and graft survival with SLK versus serial liver-kidney transplantation.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Figures
Comment in
-
To kidney or not to kidney, when … is the question.Liver Transpl. 2012 Aug;18(8):875-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.23462. Liver Transpl. 2012. PMID: 22829417 No abstract available.
References
-
- US Multicenter FK-506 Liver Study Group. A comparison of tacrolimus (FK 506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression in liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 27;331(17):1110–1115. - PubMed
-
- Gonwa TA, Mai ML, Melton LB, et al. End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) using calcineurin-based immunotherapy. Transplantation. 2001 Dec 27;72(12):1934–1939. - PubMed
-
- Fisher NC, Nightingale PG, Gunson BK, et al. Chronic renal failure after liver transplantation: A retrospective analysis. Transplantation. 1998 Jul 15;66(1):59–66. - PubMed
-
- Klintmalm GB, Gonwa TA. Nephrotoxocity associated with cyclosporine and FK506. Liver Transpl Surg. 1995 Sep;1(5 Suppl 1):11–19. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical