Multicenter, randomized, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of micafungin versus itraconazole for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant
- PMID: 22469884
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.03.014
Multicenter, randomized, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of micafungin versus itraconazole for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant
Abstract
This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of micafungin and itraconazole in prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplants in China. Micafungin (50 mg/day i.v.) or itraconazole (5 mg/kg/day p.o.) was administered for ≤42 days. The primary endpoint, treatment success, was defined as no proven, probable, or suspected invasive fungal infection through therapy and the absence of proven or probable invasive fungal infection through the end of 4 weeks after therapy. Noninferiority of micafungin against itraconazole was established if the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was >10%. Of 287 patients, 283 were evaluable for efficacy (136 for micafungin, 147 for itraconazole, intent-to-treat population). Treatment success was documented in 92.6% (126 of 136) of micafungin-treated patients and 94.6% (139 of 147) of itraconazole-treated patients (95% CI, -7.562% to 3.482%; P = .48), indicating noninferiority of micafungin against itraconazole. Results were similar for patients treated per protocol. Whereas the rates of proven or probable invasive fungal infection were numerically higher with micafungin than itraconazole at 4.4% (6 of 136) and 1.4% (2 of 147), rates of suspected invasive fungal infection were similar at 5.9% (8 of 136) and 7.5% (11 of 147), respectively. More patients treated with micafungin than itraconazole completed the study (82.9% versus 67.3%, respectively). Significant differences in incidence of withdrawal due to an adverse event (4.4% versus 21.1%) and drug-related adverse events (8% versus 26.5%) were shown between micafungin and itraconazole (P = .00, chi-square test). Micafungin was as effective as itraconazole in preventing invasive fungal infections in patients with neutropenia. In comparison to itraconazole, treatment tolerance was much better with micafungin.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00794703.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Korea.Clin Ther. 2009 May;31(5):1105-15; discussion 1066-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.011. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19539111
-
Systemic antifungal prophylaxis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis.Clin Ther. 2014 Feb 1;36(2):292-306.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Jan 17. Clin Ther. 2014. PMID: 24439393
-
Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Nov 15;39(10):1407-16. doi: 10.1086/422312. Epub 2004 Oct 27. Clin Infect Dis. 2004. PMID: 15546073 Clinical Trial.
-
Antifungal prophylaxis with itraconazole oral solution in neutropenic patients.Mycoses. 1999;42 Suppl 2:121-4. Mycoses. 1999. PMID: 10865918 Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of echinocandins versus triazoles for the prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections: a meta-analysis of RCTs.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Apr;34(4):651-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2287-4. Epub 2014 Dec 14. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25502737 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Antifungal Prophylaxis Drugs in Patients With Hematological Disease or Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2017652. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17652. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33030550 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of primary oral antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Mar 17;15:128. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0855-6. BMC Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25887385 Free PMC article.
-
Changing Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Disease in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Oct 10;7(10):848. doi: 10.3390/jof7100848. J Fungi (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34682269 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of micafungin for the treatment of patients with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis: A non-comparative, multicenter, phase IV, open-label study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(52):e9443. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009443. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29384927 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Micafungin versus posaconazole prophylaxis in acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: A randomized study.J Infect. 2018 Sep;77(3):227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 May 7. J Infect. 2018. PMID: 29746955 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical