Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;194(4):944-952.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

Plant stoichiometry at different scales: element concentration patterns reflect environment more than genotype

Affiliations
Free article

Plant stoichiometry at different scales: element concentration patterns reflect environment more than genotype

Göran I Ågren et al. New Phytol. 2012 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

All plant species require at least 16 elements for their growth and survival but the relative requirements and the variability at different organizational scales is not well understood. We use a fertiliser experiment with six willow (Salix spp.) genotypes to evaluate a methodology based on Euclidian distances for stoichiometric analysis of the variability in leaf nutrient relations of twelve of those (C, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, S, Fe, Zn, B, Cu) plus Na and Al. Differences in availability of the elements in the environment was the major driver of variation. Variability between leaves within a plant or between individuals of the same genotype growing in close proximity was as large as variability between genotypes. Elements could be grouped by influence on growth: N, P, S and Mn concentrations follow each other and increase with growth rate; K, Ca and Mg uptake follow the increase in biomass; but uptake of Fe, B, Zn and Al seems to be limited. The position of Cu lies between the first two groups. Only for Na is there a difference in element concentrations between genotypes. The three groups of elements can be associated with different biochemical functions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ågren GI. 2004. The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs: theory and observations. Ecology Letters 7: 185-191.
    1. Ågren GI. 2008. Stoichiometry and nutrition of plant growth in natural communities. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 39: 153-170.
    1. Alonso C, Herrera CM. 2001. Patterns made of patterns: variation and covariation of leaf nutrient concentrations within and between populations of Prunus mahaleb. New Phytologist 150: 629-640.
    1. Alonso C, Herrera CM. 2003. Developmental and spatial covariation of nutrients in growing leaves of Daphne laureola and their relationships with herbivory. New Phytologist 159: 645-656.
    1. Cernusak LA, Winter K, Turner BL. 2010. Leaf nitrogen to phosphorus ratios of tropical trees: experimental assessment of physiological and environmental controls. New Phytologist 185: 770-779.

LinkOut - more resources