Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;26(3):431-41.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.666502.

Emotion in the neutral face: a mechanism for impression formation?

Affiliations

Emotion in the neutral face: a mechanism for impression formation?

Reginald B Adams Jr et al. Cogn Emot. 2012.

Abstract

The current work examined contributions of emotion-resembling facial cues to impression formation. There exist common facial cues that make people look emotional, male or female, and from which we derive personality inferences. We first conducted a Pilot Study to assess these effects. We found that neutral female versus neutral male faces were rated as more submissive, affiliative, naïve, honest, cooperative, babyish, fearful, happy, and less angry than neutral male faces. In our Primary Study, we then "warped" these same neutral faces over their corresponding anger and fear displays so the resultant facial appearance cues now structurally resembled emotion while retaining a neutral visage (e.g., no wrinkles, furrows, creases, etc.). The gender effects found in the Pilot Study were replicated in the Primary Study, suggesting clear stereotype-driven impressions. Critically, ratings of the neutral-over-fear warps versus neutral-over-anger warps also revealed a profile similar to the gender-based ratings, revealing perceptually driven impressions directly attributable to emotion overgeneralisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of stimulus warping manipulation used in the Primary Study in which a neutral image is averaged with its corresponding fear expression to generate a 50/50 average of the images structural components, while holding the neutral image’s texture map constant. The resultant image shares a structural resemblance with the fear expression, but is not overtly expressive.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of male and female neutral facial image warped over corresponding anger and fear expressions.

References

    1. Adams RB, Jr, Kleck RE. Differences in perceived emotional disposition based on static facial structure. Society for Personality and Social Psychology; Savannah, GA: 2002.
    1. Adams RB, Jr, Kleck RE. Differences in perceived emotional disposition based on static facial structure. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology; Savannah, GA. 2002. Jan,
    1. Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 1996;71:230–244. - PubMed
    1. Beaupré MG, Cheung N, Hess U. Unpublished stimulus set. 2000. The Montreal Set of Facial Displays of Emotion.
    1. Becker DV, Kenrick DT, Neuberg SL, Blackwell KC, Smith DM. The Confounded Nature of Angry Men and Happy Women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;92:179–190. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources