Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 May;22(3):203-9.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835259aa.

Cancer overdiagnosis and overtreatment

Affiliations
Review

Cancer overdiagnosis and overtreatment

Laurence Klotz. Curr Opin Urol. 2012 May.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Overdiagnosis has become a major problem in medicine in general and cancer in particular. This is a summary of this problem.

Recent findings: Because of earlier detection, the nature of cancer has changed, from a disease usually diagnosed at a late and incurable stage to a heterogeneous condition that varies from clinically insignificant to rapidly aggressive. Screening programs for cancer have resulted in a dramatic increase in the diagnosis of clinically insignificant disease, balanced by improved survival and mortality because of significant cancers being diagnosed at a more curable stage. Overdiagnosis requires the presence of microfocal disease and a screening test to identify this. This exists for breast, prostate, and thyroid cancers, and to a lesser degree for renal and lung cancer. The problem of cancer overdiagnosis and overtreatment is complex, with numerous causes and many trade-offs. It is particularly important in prostate cancer, but is a major issue in many other cancer sites. Screening for prostate cancer appears, based on the best data from randomized trials, to significantly reduce cancer mortality.

Summary: Reducing overtreatment in patients diagnosed with indolent disease is critical to the success of screening.

PubMed Disclaimer