Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jun;27(6):1829-39.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/des101. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

The value of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in the long GnRH agonist protocol: association with ovarian response and gonadotrophin-dose adjustments

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The value of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in the long GnRH agonist protocol: association with ovarian response and gonadotrophin-dose adjustments

Ellen Anckaert et al. Hum Reprod. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the predictive value of serum and follicular fluid (FF) concentrations of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) with respect to treatment outcome variables in an IVF cycle.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed with data from 731 normogonadotrophic women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation after stimulation with highly purified menotrophin (HP-hMG) or rFSH following a long GnRH agonist protocol.

Results: In both treatment groups, the serum AMH concentration at the start of the stimulation was significantly (P < 0.001) positively correlated with the serum levels of estradiol (HP-hMG: r = 0.45; rFSH: r = 0.55), androstenedione (HP-hMG: r = 0.50; rFSH: 0.49) and total testosterone (HP-hMG: r = 0.40; rFSH: r = 0.36) at the end of the stimulation as well as the number of oocytes retrieved (HP-hMG: r = 0.48; rFSH: r = 0.62), the AMH concentration in FF (HP-hMG: r = 0.55; rFSH: 0.61) and the serum progesterone concentration (HP-hMG: r = 0.39; rFSH: r = 0.50) at oocyte retrieval. For both treatments, serum AMH at the start of the stimulation was a good predictor of the need to increase or decrease the gonadotrophin dose on stimulation day 6 and of ovarian response below (<7 oocytes) or above (>15 oocytes) the target. No significant relationships were observed between serum AMH and embryo quality or ongoing pregnancy.

Conclusion: The serum AMH concentration at the start of the stimulation in IVF patients down-regulated with GnRH agonist in the long protocol revealed a positive relationship with ovarian response to gonadotrophins in terms of oocytes retrieved and accompanying endocrine response. AMH is a good predictor of the need for gonadotrophin-dose adjustment on stimulation day 6 for patients with a fixed starting dose, but a poor predictor of embryo quality and pregnancy chances in individual patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve analysis showing the predictive value of serum AMH at the start of the stimulation for the estimation of number of oocytes at retrieval below (<7) (A) and above (>15) the target (B) after COS in patients treated with HP-hMG or rFSH in the long GnRH agonist protocol. The diagonal line is the reference line of no discrimination (AUC = 0.5). Cut-off values for response below the target were 21.2 pmol/l for HP-hMG (sens. 66.7%, spec. 75.2%) and 16.4 pmol/l for rFSH (sens. 81.0%, spec. 88.3%). The cut-off values for response above the target were 29.8 pmol/l for HP-hMG (sens. 73.3%, spec. 67.0%) and 29.5 pmol/l for rFSH (sens. 82.5%, spec. 70.4%).
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve analysis showing the predictive value of serum AMH at the start of the stimulation for the need for a gonadotrophin-dose increase (A) or decrease (B) on stimulation day 6 in patients treated with HP-hMG or rFSH in the long GnRH agonist protocol. All patients had received starting doses of 225 IU/day for the first 5 days. The diagonal line is the reference line of no discrimination (AUC = 0.5). Cut-off values for increased dose were 23.0 pmol/l for HP-hMG (sens. 67.8%, spec. 67.1%) and 21.4 pmol/l for rFSH (sens. 74.6%, spec. 73.6%). The cut-off values for decreased dose were 32.4 pmol/l for HP-hMG (sens. 70.8%, spec. 72.6%) and 37.4 pmol/l for rFSH (sens. 75.0%, spec. 80.7%).
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curve analysis showing the predictive value of serum AMH at the start of the stimulation for ongoing pregnancy in patients treated with HP-hMG or rFSH in the long agonist protocol. The diagonal line is the reference line of no discrimination (AUC = 0.5).

References

    1. Arce J-C, Nyboe Andersen A, Collins J. Resolving methodological and clinical issues in the design of efficacy trials in assisted reproductive technologies: a mini-review. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1757–1771. doi:10.1210/en.136.11.4951. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baarends WM, Uilenbroek JT, Kramer P, Hoogerbrugge JW, van Leeuwen EC, Themmen AP, Grootegoed JA. Anti-mullerian hormone and anti-mullerian hormone type II receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in rat ovaries during postnatal development, the estrous cycle, and gonadotropin-induced follicle growth. Endocrinology. 1995;136:4951–4962. doi:10.1210/en.136.11.4951. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broer SL, Mol BW, Hendriks D, Broekmans FJ. The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:705–714. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broer SL, Mol B, Dólleman M, Fauser BC, Broekmans FJ. The role of anti-Müllerian hormone assessment in assisted reproductive technology outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:193–201. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283384911. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broer SL, Dólleman M, Opmeer BC, Fauser BC, Mol BW, Broekmans FJ. AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:46–54. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq034. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types