Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 May;64(5):625-39.
doi: 10.1002/acr.21641.

2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Jasvinder A Singh  1 , Daniel E Furst, Aseem Bharat, Jeffrey R Curtis, Arthur F Kavanaugh, Joel M Kremer, Larry W Moreland, James O'Dell, Kevin L Winthrop, Timothy Beukelman, S Louis Bridges Jr, W Winn Chatham, Harold E Paulus, Maria Suarez-Almazor, Claire Bombardier, Maxime Dougados, Dinesh Khanna, Charles M King, Amye L Leong, Eric L Matteson, John T Schousboe, Eileen Moynihan, Karen S Kolba, Archana Jain, Elizabeth R Volkmann, Harsh Agrawal, Sangmee Bae, Amy S Mudano, Nivedita M Patkar, Kenneth G Saag
Affiliations
Review

2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Jasvinder A Singh et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 May.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Conflict: Forms submitted as required

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. 2012 American College of Rheumatology Recommendations Update for Treatment of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, Defined as Disease Duration < 6 Months
1Definitions of disease activity are discussed in Tables 2 and 3 and Appendix 4 and were categorized as low, moderate or high 2Patients were categorized based on presence or absence of one or more of the following poor prognostic features: functional limitation (e.g., health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score or similar valid tools); extra-articular disease (e.g., presence of rheumatoid nodules, RA vasculitis, Felty’s syndrome); positive rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies (–37); bony erosions by radiograph (38) HCQ, Hydroxychloroquine; MTX, methotrexate; DMARD, Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug- includes hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, methotrexate, minocycline and sulfasalazine; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; TNF, Tumor-necrosis Factor For the level of evidence supporting each recommendation, please see Appendix 7.
Figure 2
Figure 2. 2012 American College of Rheumatology Recommendations Update for Treatment of Established Rheumatoid Arthritis (Disease Duration≥ 6 months or Meeting 1987 ACR Classification Criteria)
* Reassess after 3 months and proceed escalating therapy if Moderate or High Disease Activity in all instances except after treatment with non-TNF biologic (rectangle D), where reassessment is recommended at 6-months due to a longer anticipated time for peak effect 1Definitions of disease activity are discussed in Tables 2 and 3 and Appendix 4 and were categorized as low, moderate or high 2Features of poor prognosis included the presence of one or more of the following: functional limitation (e.g., health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score or similar valid tools); extra-articular disease (e.g., presence of rheumatoid nodules, RA vasculitis, Felty’s syndrome); positive rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies (–37); bony erosions by radiograph (38) 3Combination DMARD therapy with two DMARDs, which is most commonly methotrexate-based with few exceptions (for example, methotrexate + hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate + leflunomide, methotrexate + sulfasalazine, sulfasalazine + hydroxychloroquine) and triple therapy (methotrexate + hydroxychloroquine + sulfasalazine). 4Leflunomide can be added in patients with low disease activity after 3–6 months of minocycline, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate or sulfasalazine 5If after 3 months of intensified DMARD combination-therapy or after a second DMARD has failed, the option is to add or switch to an anti-TNF biologic. 6Reassessment after treatment with non-TNF biologic is recommended at 6-months due to anticipation that a longer time to peak effect is needed for non-TNF compared to anti-TNF biologics. 7Any adverse event was defined as per the U.S. FDA as any undesirable experience associated with the use of a medical product in a patient. Serious adverse events were defined per the U.S. FDA (see below); all other adverse events were considered non-serious adverse events. The FDA definition of serious adverse event includes death, life-threatening event, initial or prolonged hospitalization, disability, congenital anomaly or an adverse event requiring intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage. For the level of evidence supporting each recommendation, please see Appendix 7. MTX, methotrexate; LEF, leflunomide; HCQ, Hydroxychloroquine; TNF, Tumor-necrosis factor DMARD, Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug include hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, methotrexate, minocycline and sulfasalazine (therapies are listed alphabetically; azathioprine and cyclosporine were considered but not included) DMARD monotherapy refers to treatment in most instances with hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, methotrexate or sulfasalazine; in few instances, where appropriate, minocycline may also be used Anti-TNF biologics include adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, infliximab, golimumab Non-TNF biologics include abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab (therapies are listed alphabetically)
Figure 3
Figure 3. 2012 American College of Rheumatology Recommendations Update for Tuberculosis Screening with Biologic Use
1Anergy panel testing is not recommended 2IGRA is preferred if patient has a history of Bacillus-Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination 3Risk factors for TB exposure are defined based on a publication from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as: close contacts of persons known or suspected to have active tuberculosis; foreign-born persons from areas that have a high incidence of active tuberculosis (e.g., Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Russia); persons who visit areas with a high prevalence of active tuberculosis, especially if visits are frequent or prolonged; residents and employees of congregate settings whose clients are at increased risk for active tuberculosis (e.g., correctional facilities, long-term care facilities, and homeless shelters); health-care workers who serve clients who are at increased risk for active tuberculosis; populations defined locally as having an increased incidence of latent M. tuberculosis infection or active tuberculosis, possibly including medically underserved, low-income populations, or persons who abuse drugs or alcohol; and infants, children, and adolescents exposed to adults who are at increased risk for latent M. tuberculosis infection or active tuberculosis. (16) 4If patient is immunosuppressed and false negative results more likely, consider repeating screening test(s) with TST or IGRA. 5Chest radiograph may also be considered when clinically indicated in patients with risk factors, even with a negative repeat TST or IGRA. 6Obtain respiratory (e.g., sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage) or other samples as clinically appropriate for AFB smear and culture. Consider referral to TB specialist for further work-up and treatment. 7In a patient diagnosed with latent or active TB, consider referral to a specialist for the recommended treatment. 8Patients who test positive for TST or IGRA at baseline often remain positive for these tests even after successful treatment of TB. These patients need monitoring for clinical signs and symptoms of recurrent TB disease, since repeating tests will not allow help in diagnosis of recurrent TB. The level of evidence supporting each recommendation for TB reactivation was “C”, except for initiation of biologics in patients being treated for latent TB infection (LTBI), where the Level of Evidence was “B”) TST, Tuberculin Skin Test; IGRA, Interferon-gamma release assay; AFB, Acid fast bacilli
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Saag KG, Teng GG, Patkar NM, Anuntiyo J, Finney C, Curtis JR, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2008 recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(6):762–84. Epub 2008/06/03. - PubMed
    1. McGory ML, Shekelle PG, Rubenstein LZ, Fink A, Ko CY. Developing quality indicators for elderly patients undergoing abdominal operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(6):870–83. Epub 2005/11/29. - PubMed
    1. Shekelle P. The appropriateness method. Med Decis Making. 2004;24(2):228–31. Epub 2004/04/20. - PubMed
    1. Shekelle PG, Park RE, Kahan JP, Leape LL, Kamberg CJ, Bernstein SJ. Sensitivity and specificity of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to identify the overuse and underuse of coronary revascularization and hysterectomy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(10):1004–10. Epub 2001/09/29. - PubMed
    1. Singh JA, Noorbaloochi S, Singh G. Golimumab for rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD008341. Epub 2010/01/22. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms