Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;42(1):25-33.
doi: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.25. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

Evaluation of accuracy of 3D reconstruction images using multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT

Affiliations

Evaluation of accuracy of 3D reconstruction images using multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT

Mija Kim et al. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to determine the accuracy of linear measurements on three-dimensional (3D) images using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods: MDCT and CBCT were performed using 24 dry skulls. Twenty-one measurements were taken on the dry skulls using digital caliper. Both types of CT data were imported into OnDemand software and identification of landmarks on the 3D surface rendering images and calculation of linear measurements were performed. Reproducibility of the measurements was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA and ICC, and the measurements were statistically compared using a Student t-test.

Results: All assessments under the direct measurement and image-based measurements on the 3D CT surface rendering images using MDCT and CBCT showed no statistically difference under the ICC examination. The measurements showed no differences between the direct measurements of dry skull and the image-based measurements on the 3D CT surface rendering images (P>.05).

Conclusion: Three-dimensional reconstructed surface rendering images using MDCT and CBCT would be appropriate for 3D measurements.

Keywords: Reproducibility of Results; Skull; Three-Dimensional Image.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An example of dry skull specimen with mandible fixed to the cranium.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
An example of MDCT 3D image (left) and CBCT 3D image (right) on OnDemend™ (Cybermed, Seoul, Korea) software.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A modified digital caliper to measure distance between landmarks located in concave surface.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
An example of measurement between mid-sagittal landmarks using OnDemand. A. MDCT. B. CBCT.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1558–1564. - PubMed
    1. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(suppl 1):31–36. - PubMed
    1. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:219–226. - PubMed
    1. Maki K, Inou N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ. Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(suppl 1):95–101. - PubMed
    1. Aboudara CA, Hatcher D, Nielsen IL, Miller A. A three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(suppl 1):173–175. - PubMed