Bolting and flowering control in sugar beet: relationships and effects of gibberellin, the bolting gene B and vernalization
- PMID: 22476070
- PMCID: PMC3000703
- DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plq012
Bolting and flowering control in sugar beet: relationships and effects of gibberellin, the bolting gene B and vernalization
Abstract
Background and aims: Bolting, the first visible sign of reproductive transition in beets (Beta vulgaris), is controlled by the dominant bolting gene B (B allele), which allows for flowering under long days (LDs, >14 h light) without prior vernalization. The B-locus carries recessive alleles (bb) in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. spp. vulgaris), so that vernalization and LDs are required for bolting and flowering. Gibberellin growth hormones (GAs) control stem elongation and reproductive development, but their role during these processes in sugar beet is not defined. We aimed to investigate the involvement of GAs in bolting and flowering in sugar beet, and also its relationship with the vernalization requirement as defined by the B-gene.
Methodology: Plants segregating for the B allele were treated with exogenous GA(4) under inductive (16 h light) and non-inductive (8 h light) photoperiods, with and without prior vernalization treatment. A co-dominant polymerase chain reaction (PCR) marker was used to genotype the B-gene locus. Bolting and flowering dates were scored, and bolt heights were measured as appropriate. Analysis of variance was used to determine the effects and interactions of GAs, the B allele and vernalization on bolting and flowering. The effects of the B allele on bolting were also verified in the field.
Principal results: Application of GAs or the B allele could initiate bolting independently. When the B allele was absent, the applied GAs promoted stem growth, but did so only in vernalized plants, irrespective of photoperiod. Under LDs, bolt height before flowering in plants carrying the B allele (BB; Bb) was not significantly influenced by GAs. The timing and frequency of flowering were influenced by the B allele without interactive effects from GAs.
Conclusions: In sugar beet, GA acts independently of the B allele and photoperiod to induce bolting. Vernalization enables GA action independently of the B allele; hence, the dominant B allele may not directly participate in vernalization-induced bolting.
Figures




Similar articles
-
A new RNASeq-based reference transcriptome for sugar beet and its application in transcriptome-scale analysis of vernalization and gibberellin responses.BMC Genomics. 2012 Mar 19;13:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-99. BMC Genomics. 2012. PMID: 22429863 Free PMC article.
-
Modification of gibberellin signalling (metabolism & signal transduction) in sugar beet: analysis of potential targets for crop improvement.Transgenic Res. 2009 Apr;18(2):301-8. doi: 10.1007/s11248-008-9211-6. Epub 2008 Aug 12. Transgenic Res. 2009. PMID: 18696248
-
The FLC-like gene BvFL1 is not a major regulator of vernalization response in biennial beets.Front Plant Sci. 2014 Apr 14;5:146. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00146. eCollection 2014. Front Plant Sci. 2014. PMID: 24782884 Free PMC article.
-
The molecular basis of vernalization in different plant groups.Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2012;77:105-15. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2013.77.014449. Epub 2013 Apr 25. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2012. PMID: 23619014 Review.
-
Methylation controls the low temperature induction of flowering in Arabidopsis.Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1998;51:97-103. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1998. PMID: 10645430 Review.
Cited by
-
A new polymorphism on chromosome 6 associated with bolting tendency in sugar beet.BMC Genet. 2015 Dec 7;16:142. doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0300-2. BMC Genet. 2015. PMID: 26643662 Free PMC article.
-
A new RNASeq-based reference transcriptome for sugar beet and its application in transcriptome-scale analysis of vernalization and gibberellin responses.BMC Genomics. 2012 Mar 19;13:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-99. BMC Genomics. 2012. PMID: 22429863 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the quinoa genome reveals conservation and divergence of the flowering pathways.Funct Integr Genomics. 2020 Mar;20(2):245-258. doi: 10.1007/s10142-019-00711-1. Epub 2019 Sep 12. Funct Integr Genomics. 2020. PMID: 31515641 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping and Identification of Candidate Genes Controlling Bolting in Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.).Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 30;13:850810. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.850810. eCollection 2022. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 35432424 Free PMC article.
-
Physiological and Biochemical Changes in Sugar Beet Seedlings to Confer Stress Adaptability under Drought Condition.Plants (Basel). 2020 Nov 7;9(11):1511. doi: 10.3390/plants9111511. Plants (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33171867 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abe J, Guan GP, Shimamoto Y. A marker-assisted analysis of bolting tendency in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Euphytica. 1997;94:137–144.
-
- Abe J, Guan GP, Shimamoto Y. A gene complex for annual habit in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Euphytica. 1997;94:129–135.
-
- Abegg FA. A genetic factor for the annual habit in beets and linkage relationships. Journal of Agricultural Research. 1936;53:493–511.
-
- Bell GDH. Induced bolting and anthesis in sugar beet and the effect of selection of physiological types. Journal of Agricultural Science. 1946;36:167–183.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous