Prolongation of QRS duration and axis deviation in the right bundle branch block are not markers for left ventricular systolic dysfunction
- PMID: 22477595
- PMCID: PMC3005414
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1278372
Prolongation of QRS duration and axis deviation in the right bundle branch block are not markers for left ventricular systolic dysfunction
Abstract
Background: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is not commonly associated with structural heart disease and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the QRS duration and degree of right axis deviation (RAD) or left axis deviation (LAD) in patients with RBBB predicted a subset of patients with significant LV systolic dysfunction.
Methods: In the present prospective study, 75 of 200 consecutive patients with RBBB had their ejection fraction (EF) evaluated by echocardiography. The relationship among QRS duration, axis and EF was derived.
Results: There were no significant differences in sex and EF among the patients with a normal axis, RAD or LAD. The EFs of patients with a normal axis (n=27), RAD (n=15) and LAD (n=33) were 52±15%, 49±14% and 46±17%, respectively (P=0.35). The mean EF (46±16%) of patients with a QRS duration of 150 ms or greater (n=53) was not significantly different from the mean EF (49±18%) of patients with a QRS duration of less than 150 ms (n=22) (P=0.54). For patients with a QRS of 120 ms or greater and less than 150 ms (n=22), QRS of 150 ms or greater and 180 ms or less (n=48), and QRS of greater than 180 ms (n=5), the mean EFs were 49±18%, 47±16% and 44±7%, respectively (P=0.78). There was no significant correlation between QRS duration and EF in all patients (r=0.03, P=0.83), EF and RAD (r=0.38, P=0.16) or EF and LAD (r=0.26, P=0.14).
Conclusions: In patients with RBBB, the QRS duration and axis do not have a significant relationship with EF. Furthermore, prolongation of the QRS duration (150 ms or greater) in the presence of RBBB is not a marker of significant LV systolic dysfunction.
Similar articles
-
Prolonged QRS duration (QRS >/=170 ms) and left axis deviation in the presence of left bundle branch block: A marker of poor left ventricular systolic function?Am Heart J. 2001 Nov;142(5):756-9. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.118735. Am Heart J. 2001. PMID: 11685159
-
QRS axis and the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure enrolled in MADIT-CRT.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):442-8. doi: 10.1111/jce.12057. Epub 2012 Dec 17. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013. PMID: 23252875 Clinical Trial.
-
Left ventricular electromechanical delay in patients with heart failure and normal QRS duration and in patients with right and left bundle branch block.Europace. 2007 Jan;9(1):41-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul144. Europace. 2007. PMID: 17224421
-
Patients with left bundle branch block and left axis deviation show a specific left ventricular asynchrony pattern: Implications for left ventricular lead placement during CRT implantation.J Electrocardiol. 2018 Mar-Apr;51(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 21. J Electrocardiol. 2018. PMID: 29174022
-
Left ventricular conduction delays and relation to QRS configuration in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 1;103(11):1578-85. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.379. Epub 2009 Apr 22. Am J Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19463519
Cited by
-
Right ventricular failure predicted from right bundle branch block: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging validation.Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016 Oct;6(5):432-438. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.04.02. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016. PMID: 27747166 Free PMC article.
-
Ventricular dysfunction consequences of mechanical dyssynchrony in isolated complete right bundle branch block versus left bundle branch block.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Aug 1;14(8):5650-5664. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-959. Epub 2024 Jan 26. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024. PMID: 39144058 Free PMC article.
-
Right Bundle Branch Block and Rehospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure.Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66238. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66238. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39238703 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fahy GJ, Pinski SL, Miller DP, et al. Natural history of isolated bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1185–90. - PubMed
-
- Smith RF, Jackson DH, Harthorne JW, Sanders CA. Acquired bundle branch block in a healthy population. Am Heart J. 1970;80:746–51. - PubMed
-
- Barrett PA, Thomas-Peter C, Swan HJC, Singh BN, Mandel WJ. The frequency and prognostic significance of electrocardiographic abnormalities in clinically normal individuals. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1981;23:299–319. - PubMed
-
- Thrainsdottir IS, Hardarson T, Thorgeirsson G, Sigvaldason H, Sigfusson N. The epidemiology of right bundle branch block and its association with cardiovascular morbidity – The Reykjavik Study. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:1590–6. - PubMed
-
- Kreger BE, Anderson KM, Kannel WB. Prevalence of intra-ventricular block in the general population. The Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1989;117:903–10. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources