Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Summer;19(2):e83-5.
doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278372.

Prolongation of QRS duration and axis deviation in the right bundle branch block are not markers for left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Affiliations

Prolongation of QRS duration and axis deviation in the right bundle branch block are not markers for left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Eric R Uyguanco et al. Int J Angiol. 2010 Summer.

Abstract

Background: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is not commonly associated with structural heart disease and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the QRS duration and degree of right axis deviation (RAD) or left axis deviation (LAD) in patients with RBBB predicted a subset of patients with significant LV systolic dysfunction.

Methods: In the present prospective study, 75 of 200 consecutive patients with RBBB had their ejection fraction (EF) evaluated by echocardiography. The relationship among QRS duration, axis and EF was derived.

Results: There were no significant differences in sex and EF among the patients with a normal axis, RAD or LAD. The EFs of patients with a normal axis (n=27), RAD (n=15) and LAD (n=33) were 52±15%, 49±14% and 46±17%, respectively (P=0.35). The mean EF (46±16%) of patients with a QRS duration of 150 ms or greater (n=53) was not significantly different from the mean EF (49±18%) of patients with a QRS duration of less than 150 ms (n=22) (P=0.54). For patients with a QRS of 120 ms or greater and less than 150 ms (n=22), QRS of 150 ms or greater and 180 ms or less (n=48), and QRS of greater than 180 ms (n=5), the mean EFs were 49±18%, 47±16% and 44±7%, respectively (P=0.78). There was no significant correlation between QRS duration and EF in all patients (r=0.03, P=0.83), EF and RAD (r=0.38, P=0.16) or EF and LAD (r=0.26, P=0.14).

Conclusions: In patients with RBBB, the QRS duration and axis do not have a significant relationship with EF. Furthermore, prolongation of the QRS duration (150 ms or greater) in the presence of RBBB is not a marker of significant LV systolic dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fahy GJ, Pinski SL, Miller DP, et al. Natural history of isolated bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1185–90. - PubMed
    1. Smith RF, Jackson DH, Harthorne JW, Sanders CA. Acquired bundle branch block in a healthy population. Am Heart J. 1970;80:746–51. - PubMed
    1. Barrett PA, Thomas-Peter C, Swan HJC, Singh BN, Mandel WJ. The frequency and prognostic significance of electrocardiographic abnormalities in clinically normal individuals. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1981;23:299–319. - PubMed
    1. Thrainsdottir IS, Hardarson T, Thorgeirsson G, Sigvaldason H, Sigfusson N. The epidemiology of right bundle branch block and its association with cardiovascular morbidity – The Reykjavik Study. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:1590–6. - PubMed
    1. Kreger BE, Anderson KM, Kannel WB. Prevalence of intra-ventricular block in the general population. The Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1989;117:903–10. - PubMed