Moclobemide compared with second-generation antidepressants in elderly people

Abstract

Two multicentre studies are described here; the first compared moclobemide with mianserin and the second with maprotiline, both in elderly patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of major depressive episode. In the first study, 80 eligible patients were randomized to either moclobemide 300-500 mg or mianserin 75-125 mg per day for 4 weeks. Mean reduction in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score was 52% in both groups. The overall assessment of efficacy was good or very good for 60% of the patients, and tolerance was considered good or very good for 85% of the patients in both groups; no significant differences between the 2 treatments were seen. The second study comprised 39 hospitalized patients randomized to either moclobemide 150-300 mg daily or maprotiline 75-150 mg daily for 6 weeks. At the end of treatment, HRSD scores declined 85% in both groups compared with baseline. The overall assessment of efficacy was over 90% good or very good in both groups. Tolerance was rated good or very good for 80% of moclobemide and 75% of maprotiline patients; none of these results differed significantly between the groups, indicating that moclobemide is as effective in elderly patients as the 2 second-generation antidepressants. In view of the safety of moclobemide, it should be considered first-line therapy for depression in elderly people.