Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Feb-Apr;15(1-2):106-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

Immunotherapy: a useful strategy to help combat multidrug resistance

Affiliations
Review

Immunotherapy: a useful strategy to help combat multidrug resistance

Tyler J Curiel. Drug Resist Updat. 2012 Feb-Apr.

Abstract

Multidrug resistance (MDR) renders cancer cells relatively invulnerable to treatment with many standard cytotoxic anti-cancer agents. Cancer immunotherapy could be an important adjunct for other strategies to treat MDR positive cancers, as resistance to immunotherapy generally is unrelated to mechanisms of resistance to cytotoxic agents. Immunotherapy to combat MDR positive tumors could use any of the following strategies: direct immune attack against MDR positive cells, using MDR as an immune target to deliver cytotoxic agents, capitalization on other immune properties of MDR positive cells, or conditional immunotoxins expressed under MDR control. Additional insights into the immunogenic potential of some cytotoxic agents can also be brought to bear on these strategies. This review will highlight key concepts in cancer immunotherapy and illustrate immune principles and strategies that have been or could be used to help destroy MDR positive tumor cells, either alone or in rational combinations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The critical elements of anti-tumor immunity. Tumors express tumor antigens that should be objects of immune attack (1). Antigen presenting cells (2) take up antigen, and process and present them to antigen-specific cells, including CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes (3), that should lead to immune elimination of the tumor (4). Cytokines, such as IL-12, and surface molecules such as CD80 and CD86 provide signals that should promote this tumor-specific immune response. Antigen presenting cells such as dendritic cells, and other non-specific cells suck as natural killer cells and macrophages collectively comprise the innate immune system. Adaptive immunity includes antigen-specific cells such as CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and B cells (not shown). Despite this sophisticated immune response, which does occur in most cancers, immune elimination does not occur owing to the immune dysfunction shown in figure 2. Figure adapted from (Curiel, 2007).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Critical elements of tumor-associated immune dysfunction. Although anti-tumor immunity is elicited according to the scheme outlined in figure 1, and shown in the top half of this figure, active tumor-driven immune dysfunction (boxed portion in bottom half of the figure) thwarts immune cancer elimination. Antigen presenting cells, which in the top half can activate tumor-specific immunity, can also elicit dysfunctional immune cells that turn anti-tumor immunity off, or inhibit it through subversion by tumor factors. Factors responsible for this dysfunction can derive from the tumor itself, or from local stroma or immune cells. These agents include immune suppressive vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and interleukin (IL)-10. These molecules can directly inhibit immunity, such as the ability of TGF-β, IL-10 or VEGF to inhibit T cell activation, or can indirectly elicit other dysfunctional cells. In this latter instance, tumor IL-10 or VEGF can promote antigen presenting cells to express B7-H1, an immune molecule that can directly inhibit T cells, or promote generation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) that inhibit anti-tumor immunity. Novel strategies to overcome these complex and potent tumor-driven active defenses against anti-tumor immunity represent major new opportunities to improve the efficacy of anti-tumor immunotherapy. Figure adapted from (Curiel, 2007).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aluigi M, Debernardis D, Cimoli G, Ottoboni C, Parodi S, Russo P. Tumor-necrosis-factor and DNA topoisomerase-ii inhibitors in human ovarian-cancer - potential role in chemotherapy. Int J Oncol. 1995;7:461–467. - PubMed
    1. Apetoh L, Locher C, Ghiringhelli F, Kroemer G, Zitvogel L. Harnessing dendritic cells in cancer. Semin Immunol. 2011;23:42–49. - PubMed
    1. Apetoh L, Mignot G, Panaretakis T, Kroemer G, Zitvogel L. Immunogenicity of anthracyclines: moving towards more personalized medicine. Trends Mol Med. 2008a;14:141–151. - PubMed
    1. Apetoh L, Tesniere A, Ghiringhelli F, Kroemer G, Zitvogel L. Molecular interactions between dying tumor cells and the innate immune system determine the efficacy of conventional anticancer therapies. Cancer Res. 2008b;68:4026–4030. - PubMed
    1. Azab AK, Runnels JM, Pitsillides C, Moreau AS, Azab F, Leleu X, et al. CXCR4 inhibitor AMD3100 disrupts the interaction of multiple myeloma cells with the bone marrow microenvironment and enhances their sensitivity to therapy. Blood. 2009;113:4341–4351. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms