The risk of lymph-node metastases in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review
- PMID: 22488081
- PMCID: PMC3578695
- DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.78
The risk of lymph-node metastases in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: Endoscopic eradication therapy is used to treat mucosal neoplasms in Barrett's esophagus, but cannot cure cancers that have metastasized to lymph nodes. The risk of such metastases has been proposed as a reason to consider esophagectomy rather than endoscopic therapy for esophageal mucosal neoplasia. The objective of our study was to determine the frequency of lymph-node metastases in patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.
Methods: We performed a systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies that included patients who had esophagectomy for HGD or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus, and that reported final pathology results after examination of esophagectomy specimens.
Results: We identified 70 relevant reports that included 1,874 patients who had esophagectomy performed for HGD or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Lymph-node metastases were found in 26 patients (1.39 % , 95 % CI 0.86 – 1.92). No metastases were found in the 524 patients who had a final pathology diagnosis of HGD, whereas 26 (1.93 % , 95 % CI 1.19 – 2.66 %) of the 1,350 patients with a final pathology diagnosis of intramucosal carcinoma had positive lymph nodes.
Conclusions: The risk of unexpected lymph-node metastases for patients with mucosal neoplasms in Barrett's esophagus is in the range of 1 – 2 %. Esophagectomy has a mortality rate that often exceeds 2 %, with substantial morbidity and no guarantee of curing metastatic disease. Therefore, the risk of lymph node metastases alone does not warrant the choice of esophagectomy over endoscopic therapy for HGD and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential competing interests: None
Comment in
-
How common are lymph node metastases in patients with Barrett's esophagus complicated by high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer?Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):242-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.11.021. Epub 2012 Nov 19. Gastroenterology. 2013. PMID: 23174273 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16545207
-
Endoscopic eradication therapy for mucosal neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;29(4):446-53. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283622848. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23703368
-
Surgery versus radical endotherapies for early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD007334. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007334.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 22;5:CD007334. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007334.pub5. PMID: 23152243 Updated.
-
Utility of confocal laser endomicroscopy in identifying high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;26(4):369-77. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000057. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014. PMID: 24535597
-
Surgery versus radical endotherapies for early cancer and high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;(5):CD007334. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007334.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD007334. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007334.pub4. PMID: 20464752 Updated.
Cited by
-
Improvement over time in outcomes for patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for Barrett's oesophagus-related neoplasia: 6-year experience from the first 500 patients treated in the UK patient registry.Gut. 2015 Aug;64(8):1192-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308501. Epub 2014 Dec 24. Gut. 2015. PMID: 25539672 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Esophagectomy Following Endoscopic Resection of Submucosal Esophageal Cancer: a Highly Curative Procedure Even with Nodal Metastases.J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jan;21(1):62-67. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3210-3. Epub 2016 Aug 25. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017. PMID: 27561633
-
Can the Risk of Lymph Node Metastases Be Gauged in Endoscopically Resected Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinomas? A Multi-Center Study.J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan;20(1):6-12; discussion 12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2950-9. Epub 2015 Sep 25. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016. PMID: 26408330
-
Barrett's esophagus: lessons from recent clinical trials.Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct-Dec;29(4):417-423. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0070. Epub 2016 Jul 14. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27708506 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Usefulness of the Japan Esophageal Society Classification of Barrett's Esophagus for Diagnosing the Lateral Extent of Superficial Short-Segment Barrett's Esophageal Cancer.Gastrointest Tumors. 2022 Jun 20;9(2-4):59-68. doi: 10.1159/000525586. eCollection 2022 Dec. Gastrointest Tumors. 2022. PMID: 36590852 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Spechler SJ. Dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: limitations of current management strategies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:927–35. - PubMed
-
- Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, et al. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1084–91. - PubMed
-
- Leers JM, DeMeester SR, Oezcelik A, et al. The prevalence of lymph node metastases in patients with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma a retrospective review of esophagectomy specimens. Ann Surg. 2011;253:271–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical