[Effects of different artificial dermal scaffolds on vascularization and scar formation of wounds in pigs with full-thickness burn]
- PMID: 22490534
[Effects of different artificial dermal scaffolds on vascularization and scar formation of wounds in pigs with full-thickness burn]
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effects of three kinds of artificial dermal scaffolds on vascularization and scar formation of wounds in pigs with full-thickness burn.
Methods: Eighteen Bama miniature pigs were divided into chitosan scaffold (CS) group, sulfonated carboxymethyl chitosan scaffold (SCCS) group, and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) scaffold group according to the random number table, with 6 pigs in each group. Every pig in all groups was inflicted with 4 or 8 full-thickness scald wounds on the back (totally 96 wounds). Forty-eight hours after injury, eschars of all wounds were excised. Twenty-four wounds in CS group were transplanted with double-layer artificial dermis of collagen-chitosan and silicone rubber, those in SCCS group with double-layer artificial dermis of collagen-sulfonated carboxymethyl chitosan and silicone rubber, and those in ADM scaffold group with ADM. The rest 24 wounds in the three groups were dressed with vaseline gauze as control group. After 2 weeks of treatment, all wounds of every group were covered with skin. In post treatment (scaffold transplantation or gauze covering) week (PTW) 1, 2, 3, and 4, gross condition of wound was observed, and specimens from central parts of wounds were harvested for observation and assessment of vessels or cells with positive expression of CD31, α smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), TGF-β(1) and TGF-β(3) with SP staining. Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance and LSD test.
Results: (1) Degree of vascularization in SCCS group was better than that in the other three groups. (2) The number of vessels with positive expression of CD31 in CS, SCCS, ADM scaffold, and control groups increased gradually from PTW 1 to PTW 3, and decreased in PTW 4. There were statistical differences among 4 groups from PTW 1 to PTW 4 (with F value respectively 24.005, 38.822, 25.274, 3.856, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The numbers of vessels that expressed CD31 in SCCS group from PTW 1 to PTW 3 were more than those in the other three groups (with P values all below 0.05). (3) The numbers of vessels that expressed α-SMA in CS, SCCS, and ADM scaffold groups from PTW 1 to PTW 3 showed the similar trend of change to those of vessels that expressed CD31, which increased gradually in control group from PTW 1 to PTW 4. There were obvious differences among 4 groups from PTW 1 to PTW 4 (with F value respectively 22.637, 28.087, 62.651, 18.055, P values all below 0.01). The number of vessels that expressed α-SMA in SCCS group from PTW 1 to PTW 4 was more than that in the other three groups (with P values all below 0.05). (4) From PTW 1 to PTW 4, the number of cells with expression of TGF-β(1) in CS group was respectively (127 ± 8), (167 ± 19), (170 ± 18), (144 ± 10) per 400 times visual field, that in SCCS group was respectively (171 ± 17), (207 ± 25), (130 ± 30), (69 ± 16) per 400 times visual field, that in ADM scaffold group was respectively (106 ± 8), (159 ± 17), (171 ± 11), (145 ± 11) per 400 times visual field, and that in control group was respectively (100 ± 20), (150 ± 18), (200 ± 14), (172 ± 20) per 400 times visual field. There were statistical differences among 4 groups from PTW 1 to PTW 4 (with F value respectively 29.675, 9.503, 13.107, 54.515, P values all below 0.01). Compared with those in SCCS group, the number of cells that expressed TGF-β(1) in the other three groups was decreased in PTW 1, 2 but increased in PTW 3, 4 (with P values all below 0.05). (5) The number of cells that expressed TGF-β(3) in 4 groups increased gradually from PTW 1 to PTW 3, and decreased or increased continually in PTW 4. There were statistical differences among 4 groups from PTW 1 to PTW 4 (with F value respectively 140.612, 945.850, 714.037, 119.147, P values all below 0.01). The number of cells with positive expression of TGF-β(3) in SCCS group from PTW 1 to PTW 4 was more than that in the other three groups (with P values all below 0.05).
Conclusions: The collagen-sulfonated carboxymethyl chitosan dermal scaffold can rapidly induce growth and maturation of blood vessels during wound healing after burn. It is beneficial for wound repair at early stage with inhibition of scar proliferation.
Similar articles
-
[Comparative study on repair of full-thickness burn wound with different artificial dermal stent in pigs].Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Sep;26(5):360-4. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010. PMID: 21174793 Chinese.
-
[Mechanisms and effects of biosynthesis and apoptosis in repair of full-thickness skin defect with collagen-chitosan dermal stent].Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 May;25(3):208-12. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 19803205 Chinese.
-
Comparison studies of the in vivo treatment of full-thickness excisional wounds and burns by an artificial bilayer dermal equivalent and J-1 acellular dermal matrix.Wound Repair Regen. 2014 May-Jun;22(3):390-8. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12171. Wound Repair Regen. 2014. PMID: 24844338
-
Effect of collagen matrices on dermal wound healing.Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003 Nov 28;55(12):1595-611. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.003. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003. PMID: 14623403 Review.
-
Regeneration of injured skin and peripheral nerves requires control of wound contraction, not scar formation.Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Apr;25(2):177-191. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12516. Epub 2017 Apr 27. Wound Repair Regen. 2017. PMID: 28370669 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Application of Photobiomodulation and Stem Cells Seeded on the Scaffold Accelerates the Wound Healing Process in Mice.J Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Aug 14;15:e40. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2024.40. eCollection 2024. J Lasers Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39381785 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical