Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;22(5):349-55.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050120. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

Predictors of tobacco outlet density nationwide: a geographic analysis

Affiliations

Predictors of tobacco outlet density nationwide: a geographic analysis

Daniel Rodriguez et al. Tob Control. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To elucidate how demographics of US Census tracts are related to tobacco outlet density (TOD).

Method: The authors conducted a nationwide assessment of the association between socio-demographic US Census indicators and the density of tobacco outlets across all 64,909 census tracts in the continental USA. Retail tobacco outlet addresses were determined through North American Industry Classification System codes, and density per 1000 population was estimated for each census tract. Independent variables included urban/rural; proportion of the population that was black, Hispanic and women with low levels of education; proportion of families living in poverty and median household size.

Results: In a multivariate analysis, there was a higher TOD per 1000 population in urban than in rural locations. Furthermore, higher TOD was associated with larger proportions of blacks, Hispanics, women with low levels of education and with smaller household size. Urban-rural differences in the relation between demographics and TOD were found in all socio-demographic categories, with the exception of poverty, but were particularly striking for Hispanics, for whom the relation with TOD was 10 times larger in urban compared with rural census tracts.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that tobacco outlets are more concentrated in areas where people with higher risk for negative health outcomes reside. Future studies should examine the relation between TOD and smoking, smoking cessation, as well as disease rates.

Keywords: GIS; Smoking; density; disparities; high-risk populations; tobacco.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Urban versus rural differences in the effects of the socio-demographic variables on tobacco outlet.

References

    1. Adhikari B, Kahende J, Malarcher A, et al. Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses–United States, 200–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1226–8. - PubMed
    1. The health consequences of smoking: a report of the Surgeon General (Atlanta, GA) Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; Washington, DC: 2004.
    1. Macintyre S, Ellayway A, Cummins S. Place effects on health: how can we concetualise operationalise and measure them? Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:125–39. - PubMed
    1. Novak SP, Reardon SF, Raudenbush SW, et al. Retail tobacco outlet density and youth cigarette smoking: a propensity-modeling approach. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:670–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peterson NA, Lowe JB, Reid RJ. Tobacco outlet density, cigarette smoking prevalence, and demographics at the county level of analysis. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40:1627–35. - PubMed

Publication types