Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1280-6.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0021.

Metacognition: computation, biology and function

Affiliations

Metacognition: computation, biology and function

Stephen M Fleming et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Many complex systems maintain a self-referential check and balance. In animals, such reflective monitoring and control processes have been grouped under the rubric of metacognition. In this introductory article to a Theme Issue on metacognition, we review recent and rapidly progressing developments from neuroscience, cognitive psychology, computer science and philosophy of mind. While each of these areas is represented in detail by individual contributions to the volume, we take this opportunity to draw links between disciplines, and highlight areas where further integration is needed. Specifically, we cover the definition, measurement, neurobiology and possible functions of metacognition, and assess the relationship between metacognition and consciousness. We propose a framework in which level of representation, order of behaviour and access consciousness are orthogonal dimensions of the conceptual landscape.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A three-dimensional map of the conceptual landscape in metacognition research. There are potential dissociations between levels of representation, orders of behaviour and access consciousness. Stars indicate our best guess of where some of the theories and measures outlined in this overview are situated in this landscape. 1, ‘direct translation’ models of decision confidence [7]; 2, representational–redescription theory of consciousness [8]; 3, first-order responses to a suprathreshold stimulus. It remains an empirical question as to the degree of independence between the dimensions sketched here.

References

    1. Nelson T. O., Narens L. 1990. Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. Adv. Res. Theory 26, 125–17310.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5 (doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5) - DOI - DOI
    1. Tulving E., Madigan S. A. 1970. Memory and verbal learning. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 21, 437–48410.1146/annurev.ps.21.020170.002253 (doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.21.020170.002253) - DOI - DOI
    1. Metcalfe J. 1996. Metacognition: knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    1. Dunlosky J., Bjork R. A. 2008. Handbook of metamemory and memory, 1st edn East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press
    1. Koriat A. 2007. Metacognition and consciousness. In The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (eds Zelazo P. D., Moscovitch M., Thompson E.), pp. 289–325 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources