Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;31(4):816-26.
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0246.

Multiple drug cost containment policies in Michigan's Medicaid program saved money overall, although some increased costs

Affiliations

Multiple drug cost containment policies in Michigan's Medicaid program saved money overall, although some increased costs

Jennifer Kibicho et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Michigan's Medicaid program implemented four cost containment policies--preferred drug lists, joint and multistate purchasing arrangements, and maximum allowable cost--during 2002-04. The goal was to control growth of drug spending for beneficiaries who were enrolled in both Medicaid and Medicare and taking antihypertensive or antihyperlipidemic prescription drugs. We analyzed the impact of each policy while holding the effect of all other policies constant. Preferred drug lists increased both preferred and generic drugs' market share and reduced daily cost--the cost per day for each prescription provided to a beneficiary. In contrast, the maximum allowable cost policy increased daily cost and was the only policy that did not generate cost savings. The joint and multistate arrangements did not affect daily cost. Despite these policy trade-offs, the cumulative effect was a 10 percent decrease in daily cost and a total cost savings of $46,195 per year. Our findings suggest that policy makers need to evaluate the impact of multiple policies aimed at restraining drug spending, and further evaluate the policy trade-offs, to ensure that scarce public dollars achieve the greatest return for money spent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Exhibit 1
Exhibit 1
Headline: Timeline for Michigan Medicaid’s multiple cost containment policies SOURCE: Authors’ analysis of the timeline of Michigan Medicaid cost containment policies as implemented Notes: The effective period of each policy is as noted in the legend. Please note that the multi-state pool replaced the joint pool in May 2004
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 2
Headline: Generic market share & expenditure share. SOURCE: Authors’ analysis of market share and expenditure share from cardiovascular drug prescription claims data for Michigan Medicaid dual-eligible beneficiaries 65 years and older, between FY 2000–2004. Notes: Generic market share is the proportion of generic days supply to total days supply. Generic expenditure share is generic drug expenditures as a percentage of total drug expenditures.
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 3
Headline: Preferred/non-preferred/unlisted market share and expenditure share. SOURCE: Authors’ analysis of market share and expenditure share from cardiovascular drug prescription claims data for Michigan Medicaid dual-eligible beneficiaries 65 years and older, between FY 2000–2004. Notes: Preferred market share is the proportion of preferred drug days supply to total days supply. (Nonpreferred market share and unlisted market share are analogously defined.) Preferred drug expenditure share is the preferred drug expenditures as a percentage of total drug expenditures (nonpreferred drug expenditure share and unlisted drug expenditure share are analogously defined).

References

    1. Holahan J, Bruen B. Medicaid spending: what factors contributed to the growth between 2000 and 2002. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured; Sep, 2003.
    1. Jing Y, Klein P, Kelton C, Li X, Guo J. Utilization and spending trends for antiretroviral medications in the U.S. Medicaid program from 1991 to 2005. AIDS Res Ther. 2007;4(22) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fischer M, Avorn J. Economic implications of evidence based prescribing for hypertension: can better care cost less? J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291(15):1850–6. - PubMed
    1. Johri M, Paltiel D, Goldie S, Freedberg K. State AIDS Drug Assistance Programs: equity and efficiency in an era of rapidly changing treatment standards. Med Care. 2002;40(5):429–41. - PubMed
    1. Walensky R, Paltiel A, Freedberg K. AIDS Drug Assistance Programs: highlighting inequities in Human Immunodeficiency Virus - infection health care in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:606–10. - PubMed

Publication types