Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(4):e35087.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035087. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes

Affiliations

Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes

Aksel Paulsen et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Background: The clinical and scientific usage of patient-reported outcome measures is increasing in the health services. Often paper forms are used. Manual double entry of data is defined as the definitive gold standard for transferring data to an electronic format, but the process is laborious. Automated forms processing may be an alternative, but further validation is warranted.

Methods: 200 patients were randomly selected from a cohort of 5777 patients who had previously answered two different questionnaires. The questionnaires were scanned using an automated forms processing technique, as well as processed by single and double manual data entry, using the EpiData Entry data entry program. The main outcome measure was the proportion of correctly entered numbers at question, form and study level.

Results: Manual double-key data entry (error proportion per 1000 fields = 0.046 (95% CI: 0.001-0.258)) performed better than single-key data entry (error proportion per 1000 fields = 0.370 (95% CI: 0.160-0.729), (p = 0.020)). There was no statistical difference between Optical Mark Recognition (error proportion per 1000 fields = 0.046 (95% CI: 0.001-0.258)) and double-key data entry (p = 1.000). With the Intelligent Character Recognition method, there was no statistical difference compared to single-key data entry (error proportion per 1000 fields = 6.734 (95% CI: 0.817-24.113), (p = 0.656)), as well as double-key data entry (error proportion per 1000 fields = 3.367 (95% CI: 0.085-18.616)), (p = 0.319)).

Conclusions: Automated forms processing is a valid alternative to double manual data entry for highly structured forms containing only check boxes, numerical codes and no dates. Automated forms processing can be superior to single manual data entry through a data entry program, depending on the method chosen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Questionnaire Pairs (200 patients).

References

    1. Protti D, Wright G, Treweek S, Johansen I. Primary care computing in England and Scotland: a comparison with Denmark. InformPrimCare. 2006;14:93–99. - PubMed
    1. O'Boyle CA. Assessment of quality of life in surgery. British Journal of Surgery. 1992;79:395–398. - PubMed
    1. Lawlor DA, Chaturvedi N. Methods of measurements in epidemiology -call for a new type of paper in the IJE. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2010;39:1133–1136.
    1. Ascher RN, Koppelmann GM, Miller MJ, Nagy G, Shelton GL., Jr An interactive system for reading unformatted printed text. IEEE TransComput. 1971;C-20:1527–1543.
    1. Nagy G. A preliminary investigation of techniques for the automated reading of unformatted text. CommACM. 1968;11:480–487.

Publication types