Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2012 Apr;82(4):256-60.
doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.4.256. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure

Affiliations
Case Reports

Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure

Joong-Min Park et al. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Reversal of Hartmann's procedure is a major surgical procedure associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Because of the difficulty of the procedure, laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure is not well established. We describe our experience with this laparoscopic procedure to assess its difficulty and safety. Five patients (4 men and 1 woman) underwent laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure (LRHP). The initial surgeries were performed to manage obstructive colorectal cancer for 4 patients, and rectovesical fistula for one patient. The procedure was laparoscopically completed for 4 patients. Conversion to open laparotomy was required for one patient, secondary to massive adhesion in lower abdomen. Transient ileostomies were made in 2 cases. Operative time ranged from 240 to 545 minutes. There was no operative mortality. LRHP can be performed safely by an experienced surgeon. However, it is still technically challenging and time consuming.

Keywords: Colostomy; Hartmann's procedure; Laparoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Laparoscopic view of the colostomy.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mobilization of the left colon and splenic flexure. S, spleen; C, descending colon.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Laparoscopic view of rectal stump after pelvic adhesiolysis. R, rectal stump; SB, small bowel.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
End-to-end anastomosis with a circular stapling device. PC, proximal colon.

References

    1. Rosen MJ, Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure. Am J Surg. 2005;189:670–674. - PubMed
    1. Mazeh H, Greenstein AJ, Swedish K, Nguyen SQ, Lipskar A, Weber KJ, et al. Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a comparative retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:496–502. - PubMed
    1. Sosa JL, Sleeman D, Puente I, McKenney MG, Hartmann R. Laparoscopic-assisted colostomy closure after Hartmann's procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:149–152. - PubMed
    1. Faure JP, Doucet C, Essique D, Badra Y, Carretier M, Richer JP, et al. Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure reversal. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:495–499. - PubMed
    1. van de Wall BJ, Draaisma WA, Schouten ES, Broeders IA, Consten EC. Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:743–752. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types