Emergency department imaging protocol for suspected acute renal colic: re-evaluating our service
- PMID: 22496069
- PMCID: PMC3587076
- DOI: 10.1259/bjr/62994625
Emergency department imaging protocol for suspected acute renal colic: re-evaluating our service
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of our study is to determine the positive rate for urolithiasis in male and female patients, and evaluate whether there has been any change at our institution in the use and outcome of unenhanced multidetector CT (CT KUB) performed in the emergency department (ER) for patients presenting with suspected acute renal colic.
Methods: A retrospective review of all 1357 consecutive cases between August 2007 and August 2009 admitted to the ER and investigated with CT KUB.
Results: The positive rate for urolithiasis was 47.5% and the rate of other significant findings was 10%. Female patients had a significantly lower positive rate than male patients (26.8% vs 61.6%, p<0.001). Urological intervention was required in 37% and these patients had a larger average stone size. In young female patients with a significantly sized ureteric calculus (>4 mm), the presence of hydronephrosis vs no hydronephrosis was 83% vs 17%, respectively. Among them, only three patients required ureteroscopy for stone removal.
Conclusion: Contrary to other studies there has been no "indication creep" in the use of CT KUB at our institution. However, the young female patient presenting with suspected urolithiasis presents a particular diagnostic problem, and the significant percentage of negative examinations in females implies that an improvement in current practice is needed. The indiscriminate use of CT KUB in all female patients with flank pain should be avoided, and it is suggested that they should be initially evaluated with ultrasound to detect the presence of hydronephrosis.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Does the protocol for suspected renal colic lead to unnecessary radiation exposure of young female patients?Emerg Med J. 2010 May;27(5):389-90. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.084780. Emerg Med J. 2010. PMID: 20442172
-
Assessment of clinically significant urolithiasis positivity rate using CT KUB for suspected renal colic.Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;193(2):1009-1013. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03477-5. Epub 2023 Aug 5. Ir J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 37542633
-
Rationale use of unenhanced multi-detector CT (CT KUB) in evaluation of suspected renal colic.Int J Surg. 2012;10(10):634-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 13. Int J Surg. 2012. PMID: 23159362
-
Renal Colic Imaging: Myths, Recent Trends, and Controversies.Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019 May;70(2):164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2018.09.008. Epub 2019 Mar 8. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019. PMID: 30853305 Review.
-
Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13(11):2513-20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1937-1. Epub 2003 Jul 24. Eur Radiol. 2003. PMID: 12898174 Review.
Cited by
-
The use of artificial intelligence and deep learning reconstruction in urological computed tomography: Dose reduction at ghost level.Urol Ann. 2023 Oct-Dec;15(4):417-423. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_73_23. Epub 2023 Oct 20. Urol Ann. 2023. PMID: 38074179 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging patients with renal colic-consider ultrasound first.Insights Imaging. 2015 Aug;6(4):441-7. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0396-y. Epub 2015 May 21. Insights Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25994497 Free PMC article.
-
Differentiation of ureteral stones and phleboliths using Hounsfield units on computerized tomography: a new method without observer bias.Urolithiasis. 2017 Jun;45(3):323-328. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0918-1. Epub 2016 Sep 16. Urolithiasis. 2017. PMID: 27638519
-
Performance of Computed Tomography of the Kidneys, Ureter and Bladder in Non-Calculus Diagnoses: A Comparative Review of Non-Enhanced with Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 8;15(14):1731. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141731. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40722481 Free PMC article.
-
Audit of the Acute Management of Renal Colic in District Hospitals Within a National Health Service Trust.Cureus. 2024 Sep 20;16(9):e69825. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69825. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39435248 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kirpalani A, Khalili K, Lee S. Renal colic: comparison of use and outcomes of unenhanced helical CT for emergency investigation in 1998 and 2002. Radiology 2005;236:554–8 - PubMed
-
- Kennish SJ, Bhatnagar P, Wah TM, Bush S, Irving HC. Is the KUB radiograph redundant for investigating acute ureteric colic in the non-contrast enhanced computed tomography era? Clinical Radiology 2008;63:1131–5 - PubMed
-
- Heidenreich A, Desgrandschamps F, Terrier F. Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol 2002;41:351–62 - PubMed
-
- Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, Bove P, Covey AM, Rosenfield AT, et al. The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 1998;159:735–40 - PubMed
-
- Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG. Non-contrast spiral CT for patients with suspected renal colic. Eur Radiol 1997;7:680–5 - PubMed