Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005;1(1):65-75.
Epub 2005 Mar 31.

Fosphenytoin for the treatment of status epilepticus: an evidence-based assessment of its clinical and economic outcomes

Affiliations

Fosphenytoin for the treatment of status epilepticus: an evidence-based assessment of its clinical and economic outcomes

Andrew Thomson. Core Evid. 2005.

Abstract

Introduction: Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening condition requiring prompt treatment in the emergency department to control seizures and limit potential neurologic damage. Fosphenytoin is a water-soluble prodrug of phenytoin (an established treatment option for SE) that has been developed to overcome the often severe venous adverse events that can occur following the intravenous administration of phenytoin.

Aims: The objective of this article is to review the evidence for the use of fosphenytoin in the treatment of SE.

Evidence review: Fosphenytoin can be infused more rapidly than phenytoin and there is evidence that therapeutic drug levels are achieved at least at a similar rate. Although few studies have been conducted in SE patients, there is evidence that fosphenytoin is at least as effective as phenytoin in terms of response and control of SE. There is also moderate evidence that there are fewer vascular adverse events following intravenous fosphenytoin compared with phenytoin administration when both drugs are infused at the recommended dosage and rate. Evidence from pharmacoeconomic studies indicates that a reduction in the incidence of adverse events and their subsequent management are critical factors for cost-effectiveness with fosphenytoin.

Clinical value: In conclusion, fosphenytoin is a valuable treatment option for the rapid treatment of SE; the risk of venous adverse events is lower than with phenytoin when administered at the recommended rate.

Keywords: evidence; fosphenytoin; outcomes; status epilepticus (SE); treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Pediatric Seizure Team-based Learning.
    Dimeo SP, Sudario G, Sharma S, Bellman L, Gallion A, Andreeff K, Boysen-Osborn M. Dimeo SP, et al. J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 15;5(3):T1-T41. doi: 10.21980/J8MD22. eCollection 2020 Jul. J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 37465215 Free PMC article.

References

    1. ACEP Clinical Policies Committee Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with seizures. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:605–625. - PubMed
    1. Allen FH, Jr, Runge JW, Legarda S, et al. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous fosphenytoin (Cerebyx) in status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1995;36(Suppl. 4):90.
    1. Andrews CO, Turnbull TL, Paloucek FP, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of fosphenytoin following intravenous loading dose administration. Pharmacotherapy. 1994;14:367.
    1. Appleton R, Choonara I, Martland T, et al. The treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children. Arch Dis Child. 2000;83:415–419. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong EP, Sauer KA, Downey MJ. Phenytoin and fosphenytoin: a model of cost and clinical outcomes. Pharmacotherapy. 1999;19:844–853. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources