Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012;7(4):e33505.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033505. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

Differential inflammatory response to inhaled lipopolysaccharide targeted either to the airways or the alveoli in man

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differential inflammatory response to inhaled lipopolysaccharide targeted either to the airways or the alveoli in man

Winfried Möller et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Endotoxin (Lipopolysaccharide, LPS) is a potent inducer of inflammation and there is various LPS contamination in the environment, being a trigger of lung diseases and exacerbation. The objective of this study was to assess the time course of inflammation and the sensitivities of the airways and alveoli to targeted LPS inhalation in order to understand the role of LPS challenge in airway disease.In healthy volunteers without any bronchial hyperresponsiveness we targeted sequentially 1, 5 and 20 µg LPS to the airways and 5 µg LPS to the alveoli using controlled aerosol bolus inhalation. Inflammatory parameters were assessed during a 72 h time period. LPS deposited in the airways induced dose dependent systemic responses with increases of blood neutrophils (peaking at 6 h), Interleukin-6 (peaking at 6 h), body temperature (peaking at 12 h), and CRP (peaking at 24 h). 5 µg LPS targeted to the alveoli caused significantly stronger effects compared to 5 µg airway LPS deposition. Local responses were studied by measuring lung function (FEV(1)) and reactive oxygen production, assessed by hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) in fractionated exhaled breath condensate (EBC). FEV(1) showed a dose dependent decline, with lowest values at 12 h post LPS challenge. There was a significant 2-fold H(2)O(2) induction in airway-EBC at 2 h post LPS inhalation. Alveolar LPS targeting resulted in the induction of very low levels of EBC-H(2)O(2).Targeting LPS to the alveoli leads to stronger systemic responses compared to airway LPS targeting. Targeted LPS inhalation may provide a novel model of airway inflammation for studying the role of LPS contamination of air pollution in lung diseases, exacerbation and anti-inflammatory drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: WM received a research grant from Pari Pharma GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany for conducting a study on nasal drug delivery devices. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors declare that no competing interests exist. There is no product of Pari Pharma where WM is involved in and where the authors' share intellectual property rights or being involved in a patent. The topic of the grant is related to nasal drug delivery and is not in any case related to the topic of the submitted manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study protocol. 24 h prior to LPS inhalation blood samples were taken and analyzed for inflammatory parameters (CRP, neutrophil count).
In addition body temperature (BT) and lung function (LF) was assessed. Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) was collected and analyzed for H2O2 concentration and acidity (pH). After targeting of 1, 5 or 20 µg LPS to the airways or 5 µg LPS to the alveoli, inflammatory parameters in blood and BT, LF and EBC were assessed according the time scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Profile of exhaled CO2 of one subject and determination of the phase-1 dead space (DSPh1), the Fowler dead space (DSF) and the Bohr dead space (DSB).
DSB was used as threshold volume for airway (AW) and alveolar (AL) condensate sampling separation. In addition the first 50 mL of the exhaled air were discarded. The grey areas show the size and the penetration of the shallow and the deep LPS aerosol bolus for targeting the airways or the alveolar space.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A) Systemic response parameter ‘body temperature’ during 72 h after targeting different doses of LPS either to the airways (closed symbols) or to the alveoli (open symbols). B) Increase of 12 h - body temperature with increasing LPS dose targeted to the airways in comparison to 5 µg LPS targeted to the alveoli (open symbol). Data represent mean +/− SD (n = 7; *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01 compared to baseline; ++: p<0.01 for 5 µg alveolar compared to 5 µg airway LPS).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Systemic inflammatory response parameters after targeting LPS either to the airways (1, 5 and 20 µg, closed symbols) or to the alveoli (5 µg, open symbol).
A: absolute blood neutrophils (6 h after LPS challenge, baseline value = 3.4+/−1.3*103/µL), B: CRP (24 h after LPS challenge, baseline value = 1.4+/−0.9 mg/L) and C: IL-6 (baseline value 2.0+/−0.4 pg/mL). Data represent mean +/− SD (n = 7; *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01 compared to baseline; ++: p<0.01 for 5 µg alveolar compared to 5 µg airway LPS).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Local response parameters lung function (A, normalized FEV1) and hydrogen peroxide in airway-EBC (B) after targeting different doses of LPS either to the airways or to the alveoli.
Data represent mean +/− SD (n = 7, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01 compared to baseline).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Summary of peaking times of the different study parameters assessed after LPS challenge and associated dose – response relationships (∼D: parameter is dose dependent).

References

    1. Alexander C, Rietschel ET. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides and innate immunity. J Endotoxin Res. 2001;7:167–202. - PubMed
    1. Zhang P, Summer WR, Bagby GJ, Nelson S. Innate immunity and pulmonary host defense. Immunol Rev. 2000;173:39–51. - PubMed
    1. Maris NA, Dessing MC, de Vos AF, Bresser P, van der Zee JS, et al. Toll-like receptor mRNA levels in alveolar macrophages after inhalation of endotoxin. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:622–626. - PubMed
    1. Rietschel ET, Zahringer U, Seydel U, Ulmer AJ. Bacterial endotoxins: Bioactive conformation and specific host-recognition. Shock. 1999;12:21–21.
    1. Mueller-Anneling L, Avol E, Peters JM, Thorne PS. Ambient Endotoxin Concentrations in PM10 from Southern California. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:583–588. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms