Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct;48(15):2353-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.015. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

Matched-case comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer to establish selection criteria

Affiliations
Free article

Matched-case comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer to establish selection criteria

Ting Hu et al. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for cervical cancer still remains controversial. NACT was evaluated to establish selection criteria.

Methods: A matched-case comparison was designed for the NACT group (n=707) and primary surgery treatment (PST; n=707) group to investigate short-term responses and high/intermediate risk factors (HRFs/IRFs). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were stratified by NACT response, HRFs/IRFs, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and tumour size, respectively.

Results: The clinical and pathological response rates were 79.3% and 14.9% in the NACT group. In comparison to the PST group, IRFs but not HRFs were significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the 5-year DFS rate was significantly improved in the NACT group (88.4% versus 83.1%, P=0.021). Moreover, the 5-year DFS and OS rates were favourably increased in the clinical responders in comparison to the PST group and the clinical non-responders (P<0.05). Compared to those of clinical non-responders, the 5-year DFS and OS rates of clinical responders, with or without HRFs, were also significantly increased (P<0.01). In stage IB2, the 5-year DFS and OS rates were significantly increased, whereas operation duration declined in the NACT group (P<0.05). For patients with stage IB tumours of 2-5 cm, the 5-year DFS and OS rates of clinical responders were significantly improved (P<0.05).

Conclusions: NACT is a suitable option for patients with cervical cancer, especially for NACT responders and patients with stage IB, which provides a new concept of fertility preservation for young patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01267851.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Associated data