Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Sep;93(9):1648-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.031. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

Effects of a multifactorial falls prevention program for people with stroke returning home after rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of a multifactorial falls prevention program for people with stroke returning home after rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

Frances A Batchelor et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether a multifactorial falls prevention program reduces falls in people with stroke at risk of recurrent falls and whether this program leads to improvements in gait, balance, strength, and fall-related efficacy.

Design: A single blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up.

Setting: Participants were recruited after discharge from rehabilitation and followed up in the community.

Participants: Participants (N=156) were people with stroke at risk of recurrent falls being discharged home from rehabilitation.

Interventions: Tailored multifactorial falls prevention program and usual care (n=71) or control (usual care, n=85).

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were rate of falls and proportion of fallers. Secondary outcomes included injurious falls, falls risk, participation, activity, leg strength, gait speed, balance, and falls efficacy.

Results: There was no significant difference in fall rate (intervention: 1.89 falls/person-year, control: 1.76 falls/person-year, incidence rate ratio=1.10, P=.74) or the proportion of fallers between the groups (risk ratio=.83, 95% confidence interval=.60-1.14). There was no significant difference in injurious fall rate (intervention: .74 injurious falls/person-year, control: .49 injurious falls/person-year, incidence rate ratio=1.57, P=.25), and there were no significant differences between groups on any other secondary outcome.

Conclusions: This multifactorial falls prevention program was not effective in reducing falls in people with stroke who are at risk of falls nor was it more effective than usual care in improving gait, balance, and strength in people with stroke. Further research is required to identify effective interventions for this high-risk group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types