Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;39(5):366-71.
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182478fa5.

Intimate partner violence and sexually transmitted infections among young adult women

Affiliations

Intimate partner violence and sexually transmitted infections among young adult women

Kristen L Hess et al. Sex Transm Dis. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is common among young adult relationships, and is associated with significant morbidity, including sexually transmitted infections (STI). This study measured the association between IPV victimization and perpetration and prevalent STIs and STI-risk behaviors among a sample of young women.

Methods: This analysis uses wave 3 of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and was restricted to the 3548 women who reported on a sexual relationship that occurred in the previous 3 months and agreed to STI testing. A multivariate random effects model was used to determine associations between STI and STI-risk behaviors and IPV.

Results: The IPV prevalence over the past year was 32%-3% victim-only, 12% perpetrator-only, and 17% reciprocal. The STI prevalence was 7.1%. Overall, 17% of participants reported partner concurrency and 32% reported condom use at last vaginal intercourse. In multivariate analysis, victim-only and reciprocal IPV were associated with not reporting condom use at last vaginal intercourse. Perpetrator-only, victim-only, and reciprocal IPV were associated with partner concurrency. Victim-only IPV was associated with a higher likelihood of having a prevalent STI (odds ratio: 2.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.0-4.2).

Conclusions: This analysis adds to the growing body of literature that suggests that female IPV victims have a higher STI prevalence, as well as a higher prevalence of STI-risk behaviors, compared with women in nonviolent relationships. Women in violent relationships should be considered for STI screening in clinics, and IPV issues should be addressed in STI prevention messages, given its impact on risk for STI acquisition.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. CDC [Accessed March 31, 2011];Intimate Partner Violence: Definitions. http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/intimatepartnerviolence/definition....
    1. Whitaker DJ, Haileyesus T, Swahn M, et al. Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence. Am J Public Health. 2007 May;97(5):941–947. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coker AL. Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health? A systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007 Apr;8(2):149–177. - PubMed
    1. Teitelman AM, Ratcliffe SJ, Dichter ME, et al. Recent and past intimate partner abuse and HIV risk among young women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Mar-Apr;37(2):219–227. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manlove J, Ryan S, Franzetta K. Contraceptive use and consistency in U.S. teenagers’ most recent sexual relationships. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Nov-Dec;36(6):265–275. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types