Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:610856.
doi: 10.1155/2012/610856. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

Efficiency of manual scanning in recovering rare cellular events identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization: simulation of the detection of fetal cells in maternal blood

Affiliations

Efficiency of manual scanning in recovering rare cellular events identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization: simulation of the detection of fetal cells in maternal blood

Ahmed Emad et al. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012.

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and manual scanning is a widely used strategy for retrieving rare cellular events such as fetal cells in maternal blood. In order to determine the efficiency of these techniques in detection of rare cells, slides of XX cells with predefined numbers (1-10) of XY cells were prepared. Following FISH hybridization, the slides were scanned blindly for the presence of XY cells by different observers. The average detection efficiency was 84% (125/148). Evaluation of probe hybridization in the missed events showed that 9% (2/23) were not hybridized, 17% (4/23) were poorly hybridized, while the hybridization was adequate for the remaining 74% (17/23). In conclusion, manual scanning is a relatively efficient method to recover rare cellular events, but about 16% of the events are missed; therefore, the number of fetal cells per unit volume of maternal blood has probably been underestimated when using manual scanning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic management of detected (a), missed (b), and extra cells (c). FP: false positive, TP: true positive, N/A: not acquired.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of Giemsa, FISH and re-FISH images of three detected events.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison between detected cells and the true number of XY cells. (a) Summary of true (white bars), detected (grey bars) and missed (black bars) cells reported for observer A and observer B. (b) Regression analysis represents the correlation between these data.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Giemsa and corresponding FISH photos of missed events due to inadequate hybridization (a) or nonhybridization events (b).

Similar articles

References

    1. Méhes G, Luegmayr A, Hattinger CM, et al. Automatic detection and genetic profiling of disseminated neuroblastoma cells. Medical and Pediatric Oncology. 2001;36(1):205–209. - PubMed
    1. Al-Maghrabi J, Vorobyova L, Toi A, Chapman W, Zielenska M, Squire JA. Identification of numerical chromosomal changes detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of carcinoma. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2002;126(2):165–169. - PubMed
    1. Partridge M, Brakenhoff R, Phillips E, et al. Detection of rare disseminated tumor cells identifies head and neck cancer patients at risk of treatment failure. Clinical Cancer Research. 2003;9(14):5287–5294. - PubMed
    1. Krabchi K, Gadji M, Forest JC, Drouin R. Quantification of all fetal nucleated cells in maternal blood in different cases of aneuploidies. Clinical Genetics. 2006;69(2):145–154. - PubMed
    1. Krabchi K, Gadji M, Samassekou O, Grégoire MC, Forest JC, Drouin R. Quantification of fetal nucleated cells in maternal blood of pregnant women with a male trisomy 21 fetus using molecular cytogenetic techniques. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2006;26(1):28–34. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources