Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:570850.
doi: 10.1155/2012/570850. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

Measurement of inhaled corticosteroid adherence in inner-city, minority children with persistent asthma by parental report and integrated dose counter

Affiliations

Measurement of inhaled corticosteroid adherence in inner-city, minority children with persistent asthma by parental report and integrated dose counter

Marina Reznik et al. J Allergy (Cairo). 2012.

Abstract

Parents often overreport adherence to asthma treatment regimens making accurate assessment of medication adherence in clinical practice difficult. This study was conducted to compare two adherence assessment methods clinicians may choose from when assessing patient inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence: parental report and dose counter measurements of metered-dose inhaler (MDI) actuation. Participants included children (N = 50) with persistent asthma and their parents (N = 50). At enrollment, children received a new, marked ICS at the dose prescribed by their physician. Thirty days following enrollment, we measured ICS adherence by parental report and objectively, with a dose counter. Parental report overestimated ICS adherence when compared to dose counter. We found a statistically significant overall difference between parental report and objectively measured adherence. A dose counter that most ICS inhalers are equipped with may be a more reliable alternative measure of ICS adherence in a clinical practice setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of two methods of assessment of ICS adherence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of two methods of assessment of ICS nonadherence.

References

    1. Claudio L, Stingone JA, Godbold J. Prevalence of childhood asthma in urban communities: the impact of ethnicity and income. Annals of Epidemiology. 2006;16(5):332–340. - PubMed
    1. Garg R, Carpati A, Leighton J, Perrin M, Shah M. Asthma Facts. 2nd edition. New York, NY, USA: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2003. http://www.nyc.gov/health.
    1. Cloutier MM, Hall CB, Wakefield DB, Bailit H. Use of asthma guidelines by primary care providers to reduce hospitalizations and emergency department visits in poor, minority, urban children. Journal of Pediatrics. 2005;146(5):591–597. - PubMed
    1. Bender BG, Annett RD, Iklé D, DuHamel TR, Rand C, Strunk RC. Relationship between disease and psychological adaptation in children in the childhood asthma management program and their families. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2000;154(7):706–713. - PubMed
    1. Celano M, Geller RJ, Phillips KM, Ziman R. Treatment adherence among low-income children with asthma. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 1998;23(6):345–349. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources