Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;147(8):715-23.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.353.

Predictors of lymph node count in colorectal cancer resections: data from US nationwide prospective cohort studies

Affiliations

Predictors of lymph node count in colorectal cancer resections: data from US nationwide prospective cohort studies

Teppei Morikawa et al. Arch Surg. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors that influence the total and negative lymph node counts in colorectal cancer resection specimens independent of pathologists and surgeons.

Design: We used multivariate negative binomial regression. Covariates included age, sex, body mass index, family history of colorectal carcinoma, year of diagnosis, hospital setting, tumor location, resected colorectal length (specimen length), tumor size, circumferential growth, TNM stage, lymphocytic reactions and other pathological features, and tumor molecular features (microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, long interspersed nucleotide element 1 [LINE-1] methylation, and BRAF, KRAS, and PIK3CA mutations).

Setting: Two US nationwide prospective cohort studies.

Patients: Patients with rectal and colon cancer (N=918).

Main outcome measures: The negative and total node counts (continuous).

Results: Specimen length, tumor size, ascending colon location, T3N0M0 stage, and year of diagnosis were positively associated with the negative node count (all P.002). Mutation of KRAS might also be positively associated with the negative node count (P=.03; borderline significance considering multiple hypothesis testing). Among node-negative (stages I and II) cases, specimen length, tumor size, and ascending colon location remained significantly associated with the node count (all P.002), and PIK3CA and KRAS mutations might also be positively associated (P=.03 and P=.049, respectively, with borderline significance).

Conclusions: This molecular pathological epidemiology study shows that specimen length, tumor size, tumor location, TNM stage, and year of diagnosis are operator-independent predictors of the lymph node count. These crucial variables should be examined in any future evaluation of the adequacy of lymph node harvest and nodal staging when devising individualized treatment plans for patients with colorectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of cases analyzed in this study by State. Our patients were distributed throughout the U.S., and our results would not have been influenced by any particular surgeon or pathologist, thus increasing generalizability of our findings.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Lymph node counts in 918 colorectal cancers in our two U.S. nationwide prospective cohort studies. (A) Distribution of the negative node count. (B) Distribution of the total node count. Both negative and total node counts approximately follow a Gamma-Poisson-like distribution. (C) Correlation between the negative node count and specimen length. (D) Correlation between the negative node count and tumor size.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Compton CC. Optimal pathologic staging: defining stage II disease. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(22 Pt 2):6862s–6870s. - PubMed
    1. Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(6):433–441. - PubMed
    1. Hammond ME, Fitzgibbons PL, Compton CC, et al. College of American Pathologists Conference XXXV: solid tumor prognostic factors-which, how and so what? Summary document and recommendations for implementation. Cancer Committee and Conference Participants. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(7):958–965. - PubMed
    1. Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(8):583–596. - PubMed
    1. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK, et al. Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(18):1310–1317. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms