Predictors of lymph node count in colorectal cancer resections: data from US nationwide prospective cohort studies
- PMID: 22508672
- PMCID: PMC3404227
- DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.353
Predictors of lymph node count in colorectal cancer resections: data from US nationwide prospective cohort studies
Abstract
Objective: To identify factors that influence the total and negative lymph node counts in colorectal cancer resection specimens independent of pathologists and surgeons.
Design: We used multivariate negative binomial regression. Covariates included age, sex, body mass index, family history of colorectal carcinoma, year of diagnosis, hospital setting, tumor location, resected colorectal length (specimen length), tumor size, circumferential growth, TNM stage, lymphocytic reactions and other pathological features, and tumor molecular features (microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, long interspersed nucleotide element 1 [LINE-1] methylation, and BRAF, KRAS, and PIK3CA mutations).
Setting: Two US nationwide prospective cohort studies.
Patients: Patients with rectal and colon cancer (N=918).
Main outcome measures: The negative and total node counts (continuous).
Results: Specimen length, tumor size, ascending colon location, T3N0M0 stage, and year of diagnosis were positively associated with the negative node count (all P.002). Mutation of KRAS might also be positively associated with the negative node count (P=.03; borderline significance considering multiple hypothesis testing). Among node-negative (stages I and II) cases, specimen length, tumor size, and ascending colon location remained significantly associated with the node count (all P.002), and PIK3CA and KRAS mutations might also be positively associated (P=.03 and P=.049, respectively, with borderline significance).
Conclusions: This molecular pathological epidemiology study shows that specimen length, tumor size, tumor location, TNM stage, and year of diagnosis are operator-independent predictors of the lymph node count. These crucial variables should be examined in any future evaluation of the adequacy of lymph node harvest and nodal staging when devising individualized treatment plans for patients with colorectal cancer.
Figures
References
-
- Compton CC. Optimal pathologic staging: defining stage II disease. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(22 Pt 2):6862s–6870s. - PubMed
-
- Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(6):433–441. - PubMed
-
- Hammond ME, Fitzgibbons PL, Compton CC, et al. College of American Pathologists Conference XXXV: solid tumor prognostic factors-which, how and so what? Summary document and recommendations for implementation. Cancer Committee and Conference Participants. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(7):958–965. - PubMed
-
- Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(8):583–596. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
