Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 1;109(18):7008-12.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117133109. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

Tempo of trophic evolution and its impact on mammalian diversification

Affiliations

Tempo of trophic evolution and its impact on mammalian diversification

Samantha A Price et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Mammals are characterized by the complex adaptations of their dentition, which are an indication that diet has played a critical role in their evolutionary history. Although much attention has focused on diet and the adaptations of specific taxa, the role of diet in large-scale diversification patterns remains unresolved. Contradictory hypotheses have been proposed, making prediction of the expected relationship difficult. We show that net diversification rate (the cumulative effect of speciation and extinction), differs significantly among living mammals, depending upon trophic strategy. Herbivores diversify fastest, carnivores are intermediate, and omnivores are slowest. The tempo of transitions between the trophic strategies is also highly biased: the fastest rates occur into omnivory from herbivory and carnivory and the lowest transition rates are between herbivory and carnivory. Extant herbivore and carnivore diversity arose primarily through diversification within lineages, whereas omnivore diversity evolved by transitions into the strategy. The ability to specialize and subdivide the trophic niche allowed herbivores and carnivores to evolve greater diversity than omnivores.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Phylogeny of all 1,530 mammalian species for which we have dietary data; branch color is a rough guide to diet: herbivores, green; carnivores, blue; and omnivores, purple. The tree shown here represents one of the 100 trees used in the analysis and just one of the many possible character histories used within our analyses. This mapping of diet onto the tree, unlike the reconstructions used internally by diversitree (19), was made for the purposes of illustration without regard to diversification rates. The topology and branch lengths are from ref. .
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Plot of the posterior probability density of the parameter estimates of the all rates-free model (which was the best-fitting model from the maximum-likelihood analysis) analyzed using Bayesian MCMC methods on 10 of the 100 replicate phylogenies. (A) Depiction of the net diversification rate (speciation minus extinction) for all three trophic strategies and (B) the rate of transition between the trophic strategies.

References

    1. Fritz SA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Purvis A. Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk: Big is bad, but only in the tropics. Ecol Lett. 2009;12:538–549. - PubMed
    1. Wilson DE, Reeder DM. Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. 3rd Ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ Press; 2005. p. 2142.
    1. Crompton AW, Taylor CR, Jagger JA. Evolution of homeothermy in mammals. Nature. 1978;272:333–336. - PubMed
    1. Luo Z-X. Transformation and diversification in early mammal evolution. Nature. 2007;450:1011–1019. - PubMed
    1. Jacobs LL, Winkler DA, Murry PA. Modern mammal origins: Evolutionary grades in the Early Cretaceous of North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:4992–4995. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources