Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar 9:3:30.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00030. eCollection 2012.

Clarifying the Relationship between Average Excesses and Average Effects of Allele Substitutions

Affiliations

Clarifying the Relationship between Average Excesses and Average Effects of Allele Substitutions

José M Alvarez-Castro et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Fisher's concepts of average effects and average excesses are at the core of the quantitative genetics theory. Their meaning and relationship have regularly been discussed and clarified. Here we develop a generalized set of one locus two-allele orthogonal contrasts for average excesses and average effects, based on the concept of the effective gene content of alleles. Our developments help understand the average excesses of alleles for the biallelic case. We dissect how average excesses relate to the average effects and to the decomposition of the genetic variance.

Keywords: average effects; average excesses; effective gene content; models of genetic effects; non-equilibrium populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical interpretation of the decomposition of the genotypic values (5) through the statistical excess (in black) and the statistical (in gray) formulations of NOIA for one locus with two alleles. For simplicity, a case with equal allele frequencies (p1 = p2 = 1/2) is shown. The specific genotypic values (circles; G11 = 1, G12 = 3, G22 = 2) displaying overdominance and a fixation index (F = − 2/5) have been chosen for facilitating the visualization of the parameters of interest. The size of the circles represents the frequency of the genotypes. Horizontal dashed lines emphasize coincident arrow edges, the upper one corresponding to the population mean phenotype, μ = 2.55. The regression independent variable of the statistical formulation is the gene content, whereas the one of the statistical excess formulation is scaled by c = 1/(1 + F) = 5/3 and it works as an effective gene content. For both cases, the independent variable, w, is rescaled by its expectation as shown in Table 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Álvarez-Castro J. M., Carlborg Ö. (2007). A unified model for functional and statistical epistasis and its application in quantitative trait loci analysis. Genetics 176, 1151–116710.1534/genetics.106.067348 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cockerham C. C. (1954). An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 39, 859–882 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falconer D. S. (1985). A note on Fisher’s ‘average effect’ and ‘average excess’. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 46, 337–34710.1017/S0016672300022825 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Falconer D. S., MacKay T. F. C. (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th Edn Harlow: Prentice Hall
    1. Fisher R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh 52, 339–433

LinkOut - more resources