Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Jul;66(7):780-8.
doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.37. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

Effects of higher- versus lower-protein diets on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Meta-Analysis

Effects of higher- versus lower-protein diets on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

N Santesso et al. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jul.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background/objectives: Numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in first tier medical journals have evaluated the health effects of diets high in protein. We conducted a rigorous systematic review of RCTs comparing higher- and lower-protein diets.

Methods: We searched several electronic databases up to July 2011 for studies focusing on patient-important outcomes (for example, cardiovascular disease) and secondary outcomes such as risk factors for chronic disease (for example, adiposity).

Results: We identified 111 articles reporting on 74 trials. Pooled effect sizes using standardised mean differences (SMDs) were small to moderate and favoured higher-protein diets for weight loss (SMD -0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.56 to -0.17), body mass index (-0.37, CI -0.56 to 0.19), waist circumference (-0.43, CI -0.69 to -0.16), blood pressure (systolic: -0.21, CI -0.32 to -0.09 and diastolic: -0.18, CI -0.29 to -0.06), high-density lipoproteins (HDL 0.25, CI 0.07 to 0.44), fasting insulin (-0.20, CI -0.39 to -0.01) and triglycerides (-0.51, CI -0.78 to -0.24). Sensitivity analysis of studies with lower risk of bias abolished the effect on HDL and fasting insulin, and reduced the effect on triglycerides. We observed nonsignificant effects on total cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins, C-reactive protein, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and surrogates for bone and kidney health. Adverse gastrointestinal events were more common with high-protein diets. Multivariable meta-regression analysis showed no significant dose response with higher protein intake.

Conclusions: Higher-protein diets probably improve adiposity, blood pressure and triglyceride levels, but these effects are small and need to be weighed against the potential for harms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Flow Diagram of results of search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results of meta-analysis of outcomes using SMDs (difference between change values from baseline).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results of meta-analysis of outcomes using MDs (difference between change values from baseline).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results of secondary analysis for each outcome as SMDs (difference in the end of study values).

Comment in

References

    1. United States Department of Agriculture ChooseMyPlate.gov. . http://www.choosemyplate.gov ( accessed 9 April 2012).
    1. Health Canada Canada's Food Guide. . http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/food-guide-aliment/index-eng.php ( accessed 9 April 2012).
    1. UK Department of Health in association with the Welsh Government, the Scottish Government and the Food Standards Agency in Northern Ireland Eatwellplate. . http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Goodfood/Pages/eatwell-plate.aspx ( accessed 9 April 2012).
    1. Astrup A, Meinert Larsen T, Harper A. Atkins and other low-carbohydrate diets: hoax or an effective tool for weight loss. Lancet. 2004;364:897–899. - PubMed
    1. Yancy WS, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, Bakst RP, Westman EC, Yancy William S, et al. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia: a randomised, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:769–777. - PubMed